Dynamic modulation of corticospinal excitability and short-latency afferent inhibition during onset and maintenance phase of selective finger movement

被引:8
|
作者
Cho, Hyun Joo [1 ]
Panyakaew, Pattamon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thirugnanasambandam, Nivethida [1 ]
Wu, Tianxia [4 ]
Hallett, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] NINDS, Human Motor Control Sect, NIH, Bldg 36,Rm 4D04, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Dept Med, Fac Med, Chulalongkorn Ctr Excellence Parkinson Dis & Rela, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[3] King Chulalongkorn Mem Hosp, Thai Red Cross Soc, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[4] NINDS, Clin Neurosci Program, NIH, Bldg 36,Rm 4D04, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
Surround inhibition; Short latency afferent inhibition (SAI); Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Tonic movement; Motor evoked potential; DIRECT-CURRENT STIMULATION; SURROUND INHIBITION; MOTOR CORTEX; POTENTIALS; INITIATION; DYSTONIA; CIRCUITS; HUMANS; INPUT; HAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2016.02.020
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: During highly selective finger movement, corticospinal excitability is reduced in surrounding muscles at the onset of movement but this phenomenon has not been demonstrated during maintenance of movement. Sensorimotor integration may play an important role in selective movement. We sought to investigate how corticospinal excitability and short-latency afferent inhibition changes in active and surrounding muscles during onset and maintenance of selective finger movement. Methods: Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and paired peripheral stimulation, input-output recruitment curve and short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) were measured in the first dorsal interosseus and abductor digiti minimi muscles during selective index finger flexion. Results: Motor surround inhibition was present only at the onset phase, but not at the maintenance phase of movement. SAI was reduced at onset but not at the maintenance phase of movement in both active and surrounding muscles. Conclusions: Our study showed dynamic changes in corticospinal excitability and sensorimotor modulation for active and surrounding muscles in different movement states. SAI does not appear to contribute to motor surround inhibition at the movement onset phase. Also, there seems to be different inhibitory circuit(s) other than SAI for the movement maintenance phase in order to delineate the motor output selectively when corticospinal excitability is increased in both active and surrounding muscles. Significance: This study enhances our knowledge of dynamic changes in corticospinal excitability and sensorimotor interaction in different movement states to understand normal and disordered movements. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. on behalf of International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.
引用
收藏
页码:2343 / 2349
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Short-Latency Afferent Inhibition Modulation during Finger Movement
    Asmussen, Michael J.
    Jacobs, Mark F.
    Lee, Kevin G. H.
    Zapallow, Christopher M.
    Nelson, Aimee J.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04):
  • [2] Short-latency afferent inhibition during selective finger movement
    Bernhard Voller
    Alan St Clair Gibson
    James Dambrosia
    Sarah Pirio Richardson
    Mikhail Lomarev
    Nguyet Dang
    Mark Hallett
    Experimental Brain Research, 2006, 169 : 226 - 231
  • [3] Short-latency afferent inhibition during selective finger movement
    Voller, B
    Gibson, AS
    Dambrosia, J
    Richardson, SP
    Lomarev, M
    Dang, N
    Hallett, M
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 169 (02) : 226 - 231
  • [4] Effects of finger pinch motor imagery on short-latency afferent inhibition and corticospinal excitability
    Nakashoji, Kento
    Sasaki, Atsushi
    Kaneko, Naotsugu
    Nomura, Taishin
    Milosevic, Matija
    NEUROREPORT, 2024, 35 (06) : 413 - 420
  • [5] Changes of homotopic and heterotopic short-latency afferent inhibition on a surround muscle during finger movement
    Voller, B
    Gibson, AS
    Richardson, SP
    Lomarev, M
    Auff, E
    Hallett, M
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2005, 20 : S3 - S3
  • [6] Decrease in short-latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement
    Miyaguchi, Shota
    Kojima, Sho
    Sasaki, Ryoki
    Kotan, Shinichi
    Kirimoto, Hikari
    Tamaki, Hiroyuki
    Onishi, Hideaki
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2017, 7 (07):
  • [7] Long-latency afferent inhibition during selective finger movement
    Voller, B
    Gibson, AS
    Lomarev, M
    Kanchana, S
    Dambrosia, J
    Dang, N
    Hallett, M
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 94 (02) : 1115 - 1119
  • [8] PDGF Modulates Synaptic Excitability and Short-Latency Afferent Inhibition in Multiple Sclerosis
    Mango, Dalila
    Nistico, Robert
    Furlan, Roberto
    Finardi, Annamaria
    Centonze, Diego
    Mori, Francesco
    NEUROCHEMICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 44 (03) : 726 - 733
  • [9] PDGF Modulates Synaptic Excitability and Short-Latency Afferent Inhibition in Multiple Sclerosis
    Dalila Mango
    Robert Nisticò
    Roberto Furlan
    Annamaria Finardi
    Diego Centonze
    Francesco Mori
    Neurochemical Research, 2019, 44 : 726 - 733
  • [10] Modulation of Short-Latency Afferent Inhibition Depends on Digit and Task-Relevance
    Asmussen, Michael J.
    Zapallow, Christopher M.
    Jacobs, Mark F.
    Lee, Kevin G. H.
    Tsang, Philemon
    Nelson, Aimee J.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (08):