How well can storage capacity, executive control, and fluid reasoning explain insight problem solving

被引:22
作者
Chuderski, Adam [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, PL-31044 Krakow, Poland
关键词
Insight problem solving; Fluid reasoning; Working memory; Storage capacity; Executive control; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES APPROACH; ATTENTION CONTROL; SECONDARY MEMORY; INTELLIGENCE; PERFORMANCE; CONSTRUCTS; MECHANISMS; HYPOTHESIS; RETRIEVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.intell.2014.07.010
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous studies have found discrepant results on the relationship between insight problem solving and the processes underlying analytic thinking: storage capacity, executive control (two components of working memory; WM), as well as fluid reasoning. Some research showed that WM and/or reasoning are positively related to insight, supporting the "nothing-special" account, whereas other studies demonstrated null or negative relationships favoring the "special-process" View. This study examined a large sample with a battery of insight, reasoning, and WM tasks, to estimate the pattern of links between investigated constructs using structural equation modeling. WM and reasoning together explained about two thirds of the variance in insight. Both WM components similarly contributed to insight. WM's contribution was mediated by reasoning. These results support the nothing-special view. However, after WM variance was partialed out, the link between insight and reasoning substantially weakened, that makes room for the special-process view. Both accounts can be integrated in the view that insight is "nothing special with special add-ons" - the latter understood as the processes and strategies specific only to insight problem solving. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 270
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Memory for goals: an activation-based model [J].
Altmann, EM ;
Trafton, JG .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2002, 26 (01) :39-83
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1983, MANUAL RAVENS PROGR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, DEEP LEARNING MIND O
[4]  
[Anonymous], SOAR COGNITIVE ARCHI
[5]   Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources [J].
Ansburg, PI ;
Hill, K .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2003, 34 (07) :1141-1152
[6]   The nature of restructuring in insight: An individual-differences approach [J].
Ash, IK ;
Wiley, J .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2006, 13 (01) :66-73
[7]  
Bassok M., 2012, OXFORD HDB THINKING, P413
[8]   From poor performance to success under stress: Working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure [J].
Beilock, Sian L. ;
DeCaro, Marci S. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2007, 33 (06) :983-998
[9]   Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems [J].
Bowden, EM ;
Jung-Beeman, M .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2003, 35 (04) :634-639
[10]   Neural Mechanisms of Interference Control Underlie the Relationship Between Fluid Intelligence and Working Memory Span [J].
Burgess, Gregory C. ;
Gray, Jeremy R. ;
Conway, Andrew R. A. ;
Braver, Todd S. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2011, 140 (04) :674-692