Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Comparison with C-arm linear accelerator based plans

被引:12
作者
Zhang, Shuming [1 ]
Yang, Ruijie [1 ]
Wang, Xin [2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Hosp 3, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
CyberKnife; dosimetry; IMRT; multiple brain metastases; non-coplanar; VMAT; HYPOFRACTIONATED STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY; GAMMA-KNIFE RADIOSURGERY; SINGLE-FRACTION; THERAPY; VMAT; CYBERKNIFE; RAPIDARC; VOLUME; BEAMS; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12746
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The incidence of brain metastases is increasing and various treatment modalities exist for brain metastases. The aim of this study was to investigate the dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife) for multiple brain metastases compared with C-arm linear accelerator (linac) based plans. C-arm linac based plans included intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and non-coplanar VMAT with 1, 3 and 5 non-coplanar arcs, respectively (NC1, NC3 and NC5). For 20 patients, six plans with a prescription dose of 30 Gy in three fractions were generated. The gradient index (GI), conformity index (CI), maximum dose (D-max) of organs at risk (OARs), normal brain tissue volume (V-3 Gy-V-24 Gy), monitor units (MUs) and beam on time (BT) were evaluated. The GI of CyberKnife plans (3.60 +/- 0.70) was lower than IMRT (6.21 +/- 2.26, P < 0.05), VMAT (6.04 +/- 1.93, P < 0.05), NC1 (5.16 +/- 1.71, P < 0.05), NC3 (5.02 +/- 1.59, P < 0.05) and NC5 (5.03 +/- 1.72, P < 0.05). The CI of the VMAT plans (both coplanar and non-coplanar) was larger than IMRT and CK plans. The D-max for most OARs of the CyberKnife plan was lower than the C-arm linac based plans, although some differences were not statistically significant. The normal brain tissue volume of CyberKnife plan was lower than the C-arm linac based plans, and the normal brain tissue volume of non-coplanar VMAT plans was lower than IMRT and VMAT plans at high-moderate dose level. However, the MUs and BT of CyberKnife plans was more than C-arm linac based plans. CyberKnife plan was better than C-arm linac based plans in protecting normal brain tissue and OARs for patients with multiple brain metastases. C-arm linac based plan with non-coplanar arc provided better protection of normal brain tissue than coplanar plan. However, the BT of CyberKnife plan was longer than C-arm linac based plans.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 110
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Stereotactic body radiation therapy: The report of AAPM Task Group 101 [J].
Benedict, Stanley H. ;
Yenice, Kamil M. ;
Followill, David ;
Galvin, James M. ;
Hinson, William ;
Kavanagh, Brian ;
Keall, Paul ;
Lovelock, Michael ;
Meeks, Sanford ;
Papiez, Lech ;
Purdie, Thomas ;
Sadagopan, Ramaswamy ;
Schell, Michael C. ;
Salter, Bill ;
Schlesinger, David J. ;
Shiu, Almon S. ;
Solberg, Timothy ;
Song, Danny Y. ;
Stieber, Volker ;
Timmerman, Robert ;
Tome, Wolfgang A. ;
Verellen, Dirk ;
Wang, Lu ;
Yin, Fang-Fang .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (08) :4078-4101
[2]   IRRADIATED VOLUME AS A PREDICTOR OF BRAIN RADIONECROSIS AFTER LINEAR ACCELERATOR STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY [J].
Blonigen, Brian J. ;
Steinmetz, Ryan D. ;
Levin, Linda ;
Lamba, Michael A. ;
Warnick, Ronald E. ;
Breneman, John C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (04) :996-1001
[3]   CT-based delineation of organs at risk in the head and neck region: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, NRG Oncology and TROG consensus guidelines [J].
Brouwer, Charlotte L. ;
Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M. ;
Bourhis, Jean ;
Budach, Wilfried ;
Grau, Cai ;
Gregoire, Vincent ;
van Herk, Marcel ;
Lee, Anne ;
Maingon, Philippe ;
Nutting, Chris ;
O'Sullivan, Brian ;
Porceddu, Sandro V. ;
Rosenthal, David I. ;
Sijtsema, Nanna M. ;
Langendijk, Johannes A. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 117 (01) :83-90
[4]   Effect of Radiosurgery Alone vs Radiosurgery With Whole Brain Radiation Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients With 1 to 3 Brain Metastases A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Brown, Paul D. ;
Jaeckle, Kurt ;
Ballman, Karla V. ;
Farace, Elana ;
Cerhan, Jane H. ;
Anderson, S. Keith ;
Carrero, Xiomara W. ;
Barker, Fred G., II ;
Deming, Richard ;
Burri, Stuart H. ;
Menard, Cynthia ;
Chung, Caroline ;
Stieber, Volker W. ;
Pollock, Bruce E. ;
Galanis, Evanthia ;
Buckner, Jan C. ;
Asher, Anthony L. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (04) :401-409
[5]  
Cao H, 2019, J NEUROSURG, V22, P1
[6]   Experiences on two different stereotactic radiosurgery modalities of Gamma Knife and Cyberknife in treating brain metastases [J].
Cho, Young Hyun ;
Lee, Jung Min ;
Lee, Doheui ;
Park, Jae Hong ;
Yoon, KyoungJun ;
Kim, Seon Ok ;
Kwon, Do Hoon ;
Kim, Jeong Hoon ;
Kim, Chang Jin ;
Roh, Sung Woo .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2015, 157 (11) :2003-2009
[7]   FEASIBILITY OF SINGLE-ISOCENTER VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC RADIOSURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE BRAIN METASTASES [J].
Clark, Grant M. ;
Popple, Richard A. ;
Young, P. Edward ;
Fiveash, John B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (01) :296-302
[8]   Dosimetric characterization of hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery of large or complex brain tumors versus linear accelerator-based treatments [J].
Dong, Peng ;
Perez-Andujar, Angelica ;
Pinnaduwage, Dilini ;
Braunstein, Steve ;
Theodosopoulos, Philip ;
McDermott, Michael ;
Sneed, Penny ;
Ma, Lijun .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 125 :97-103
[9]   A treatment planning comparison between a novel rotating gamma system and robotic linear accelerator based intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy [J].
Fareed, Muhammad M. ;
Eldib, Ahmed ;
Weiss, Stephanie E. ;
Hayes, Shelly B. ;
Li, Jinsheng ;
Ma, Charlie C-M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (03)
[10]   Normal Brain Sparing With Increasing Number of Beams and Isocenters in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Beam Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases [J].
Hossain, Sabbir ;
Keeling, Vance ;
Hildebrand, Kimberly ;
Ahmad, Salahuddin ;
Larson, David A. ;
Sahgal, Arjun ;
Ma, Lijun .
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2016, 15 (06) :766-771