Clinical effectiveness of self-etching adhesives with or without selective enamel etching in noncarious cervical lesions: A systematic review

被引:3
作者
Qin, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lei, Lei [4 ]
Huang, Qi-Ting [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Lily [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Zheng-Mei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Operat Dent & Endodont, Guanghua Sch, Guangzhou 510055, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Hosp Stomatol, Guangzhou 510055, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Stomatol, Guangzhou 510055, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, State Key Lab Oral Dis, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
关键词
clinical effectiveness; meta-analysis; noncarious cervical lesion; selective enamel etching; self-etching adhesive; MARGINAL QUALITY; BONDING SYSTEMS; DENTIN; RESTORATIONS; RESIN; PERFORMANCE; AGGRESSIVENESS; STRENGTH; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2014.03.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) are among the most frequent conditions requiring resin restorations. However, the major shortcoming of these restorations is limited longevity. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical performance of self-etching (SE) adhesives with or without selective enamel etching in NCCLs. Materials and methods: An initial literature search, with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, the Wiley Online database, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Center. Eight trials were included. Restoration retention, prevalence of marginal defects, and marginal discoloration were evaluated. Data were analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel method with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Results demonstrated that fewer marginal defects (P = 0.0001) and discoloration (P = 0.008) were observed with the selective enamel etching approach. The risk ratio (RR) values of the selective etching group and the nonselective etching group for marginal defects and discoloration were 0.58 (0.44, 0.77) and 0.48 (0.28, 0.83), respectively. For restoration retention, the differences between the two groups were not significant (P = 0.44). The RR values of the selective etching group and the nonselective etching group for restoration retention were 1.01 (0.98, 1.04) and 1.02 (0.96, 1.08), according to a fixed-effects model at 2- and 5-year observation time, respectively. Conclusion: Previous enamel etching resulted in fewer marginal defects and marginal discoloration, compared with using the SE approach alone. For restoration retention, the differences between the two groups were not significant. Additional longer follow ups and large-scale investigations are expected to assess possible advantages of selective enamel etching in NCCL restorations. Copyright (C) 2014, Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 312
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条