Optimal Ki67 cut-off for luminal breast cancer prognostic evaluation: a large case series study with a long-term follow-up

被引:149
作者
Bustreo, Sara [2 ]
Osella-Abate, Simona [1 ]
Cassoni, Paola [1 ]
Donadio, Michela [2 ]
Airoldi, Mario [3 ]
Pedani, Fulvia [3 ]
Papotti, Mauro [4 ]
Sapino, Anna [1 ,5 ]
Castellano, Isabella [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Med Sci, Div Pathol, Via Santena 7, I-10126 Turin, Italy
[2] Citta Salute & Sci Hosp, Dept Med Oncol 1, Turin, Italy
[3] Citta Salute & Sci Hosp, Dept Med Oncol 2, Turin, Italy
[4] Univ Turin, Dept Oncol, I-10126 Turin, Italy
[5] FPO, Candiolo Canc Inst IRCCS, Pathol Unit, Candiolo, Italy
关键词
Ki67; cut-offs; Prognostic index; Luminal breast cancer; Relapse; INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; PRIMARY THERAPY; LABELING INDEX; TUMOR SIZE; KI-67; REPRODUCIBILITY; PROLIFERATION; HIGHLIGHTS; MARKER;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-016-3817-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although Ki67 index suffers from poor reproducibility, it is one of the most important prognostic markers used by oncologists to select the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer patients. In this study, we aim to establish the optimal Ki67 cut-offs for stratifying patient prognosis and to create a comprehensive prognostic index for clinical applications. A mono-institutional cohort of 1.577 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative/ER+ breast cancer patients having complete clinical, histological, and follow-up data was collected. The 14 and 20 % Ki67 cut-offs were correlated to disease-free interval (DFI) and disease-specific survival (DSS). To create a comprehensive prognostic index, we used independent variables selected by uni/multivariate analyses. In terms of DFI and DSS, patients bearing tumors with Ki67 < 14 % proliferation index did not differ from those with Ki67 values between 14 and 20 %. Patients with tumor with Ki67 > 20 % showed the poorest prognosis. Moreover, to tumor size, the number of metastatic lymph nodes and Ki67 > 20 % was given a score value, varying depending on definite cut-offs and used to create a prognostic index, which was applied to the population. Patients with a prognostic index a parts per thousand yen3 were characterized by significant risk of relapse [DFI: Hazard Ratio (HR) = 4.74, p < 0.001] and death (DSS: HR = 5.03, p < 0.001). We confirm that the 20 % Ki67 cut-off is the best to stratify high-risk patients in luminal breast cancers, and we suggest to integrate it with other prognostic factors, to better stratify patients at risk of adverse outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 371
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer
    Cheang, Maggie C. U.
    Chia, Stephen K.
    Voduc, David
    Gao, Dongxia
    Leung, Samuel
    Snider, Jacqueline
    Watson, Mark
    Davies, Sherri
    Bernard, Philip S.
    Parker, Joel S.
    Perou, Charles M.
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (10): : 736 - 750
  • [2] Prognostic and predictive factors in early-stage breast cancer
    Cianfrocca, M
    Goldstein, LJ
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2004, 9 (06) : 606 - 616
  • [3] Tailoring therapies-improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015
    Coates, A. S.
    Winer, E. P.
    Goldhirsch, A.
    Gelber, R. D.
    Gnant, M.
    Piccart-Gebhart, M.
    Thuerlimann, B.
    Senn, H. -J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (08) : 1533 - 1546
  • [4] Distribution pattern of the Ki67 labelling index in breast cancer and its implications for choosing cut-off values
    Cserni, Gabor
    Voeroes, Andras
    Liepniece-Karele, Inta
    Bianchi, Simonetta
    Vezzosi, Vania
    Grabau, Dorthe
    Sapino, Anna
    Castellano, Isabella
    Regitnig, Peter
    Foschini, Maria Pia
    Zolota, Vassiliki
    Varga, Zsuzsanna
    Figueiredo, Paulo
    Decker, Thomas
    Focke, Cornelia
    Kulka, Janina
    Kaya, Handan
    Reiner-Concin, Angelika
    Amendoeira, Isabel
    Callagy, Grace
    Caffrey, Emer
    Wesseling, Jelle
    Wells, Clive
    [J]. BREAST, 2014, 23 (03) : 259 - 263
  • [5] Improved Staging in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Using Lymph Node Ratio: Results in 1,788 Patients with Long-term Follow-Up
    Danko, Melissa E.
    Bennett, Kyla M.
    Zhai, Jun
    Marks, Jeffrey R.
    Olson, John A., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2010, 210 (05) : 797 - 805
  • [6] Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12 155 patients
    de Azambuja, E.
    Cardoso, F.
    de Castro, G., Jr.
    Colozza, M.
    Mano, M. S.
    Durbecq, V.
    Sotiriou, C.
    Larsimont, D.
    Piccart-Gebhart, M. J.
    Paesmans, M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 96 (10) : 1504 - 1513
  • [7] Reply to Ki67 in breast cancer: a useful prognostic marker!
    Denkert, C.
    von Minckwitz, G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (02) : 542 - 543
  • [8] Ki67 levels as predictive and prognostic parameters in pretherapeutic breast cancer core biopsies: a translational investigation in the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial†
    Denkert, C.
    Loibl, S.
    Mueller, B. M.
    Eidtmann, H.
    Schmitt, W. D.
    Eiermann, W.
    Gerber, B.
    Tesch, H.
    Hilfrich, J.
    Huober, J.
    Fehm, T.
    Barinoff, J.
    Jackisch, C.
    Prinzler, J.
    Ruediger, T.
    Erbstoesser, E.
    Blohmer, J. U.
    Budczies, J.
    Mehta, K. M.
    von Minckwitz, G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (11) : 2786 - 2793
  • [9] Tumor-related prognostic factors for breast cancer
    Donegan, WL
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1997, 47 (01) : 28 - 51
  • [10] Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group
    Dowsett, Mitch
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    A'Hern, Roger
    Bartlett, John
    Coombes, R. Charles
    Cuzick, Jack
    Ellis, Matthew
    Henry, N. Lynn
    Hugh, Judith C.
    Lively, Tracy
    McShane, Lisa
    Paik, Soon
    Penault-Llorca, Frederique
    Prudkin, Ljudmila
    Regan, Meredith
    Salter, Janine
    Sotiriou, Christos
    Smith, Ian E.
    Viale, Giuseppe
    Zujewski, Jo Anne
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (22): : 1656 - 1664