Likelihood ratio tests for model selection of stochastic frontier models

被引:31
作者
Lai, Hung-pin [1 ]
Huang, Cliff J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chung Cheng Univ, Dept Econ, Chiayi, Taiwan
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Econ, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
Akaike information criterion; Kullback-Leibler information criterion; Likelihood ratio test; Stochastic frontier model; Takeuchi information criterion; HETEROSCEDASTICITY; INEFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1007/s11123-009-0160-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
An important issue when conducting stochastic frontier analysis is how to choose a proper parametric model, which includes choices of the functional form of the frontier function, distributions of the composite errors, and also the exogenous variables. In this paper, we extend the likelihood ratio test of Vuong, Econometrica 57(2):307-333, (1989) and Takeuchi's, Suri-Kagaku (Math Sci) 153:12-18, (1976) model selection criterion to the stochastic frontier models. The most attractive feature of this test is that it can not only be used for testing a non-nested model, but also still be applicable even when the general model is misspecified. Finally, we also demonstrate how to apply this test to the Indian farm data used by Battese and Coelli, J Prod Anal 3:153-169, (1992), Empir Econ 20(2):325-332, (1995) and Alvarez et al., J Prod Anal 25:201-212, (2006).
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 13
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Aigner D., 1977, J. Econ., V6, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
[2]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[3]  
Akaike H., 1973, 2 INT S INFORM THEOR, P267
[4]   Interpreting and testing the scaling property in models where inefficiency depends on firm characteristics [J].
Alvarez, A ;
Amsler, C ;
Orea, L ;
Schmidt, P .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2006, 25 (03) :201-212
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1976, Suri-Kagaku (Mathematical Sciences)
[6]  
Baccouche R., 2003, Econometric Reviews, V22, P79, DOI [10.1081/ETC-120017975, DOI 10.1081/ETC-120017975]
[7]  
Battese G.E., 1995, Empirical Economics, V20, P325, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01205442, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442]
[8]  
Battese G.E., 1992, J. Product. Anal., V3, P153, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00158774
[9]   BIASES IN FRONTIER ESTIMATION DUE TO HETEROSCEDASTICITY [J].
CAUDILL, SB ;
FORD, JM .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1993, 41 (01) :17-20
[10]   PERFORMANCE OF LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST WHEN MODEL IS INCORRECT [J].
FOUTZ, RV ;
SRIVASTAVA, RC .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1977, 5 (06) :1183-1194