The Efficacy of Light Therapy in the Treatment of Seasonal Affective Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:94
作者
Pjrek, Edda [1 ]
Friedrich, Michaela-Elena [1 ]
Cambioli, Luca [1 ,2 ]
Dold, Markus [1 ]
Jaeger, Fiona [3 ]
Komorowski, Arkadiusz [1 ]
Lanzenberger, Rupert [1 ]
Kasper, Siegfried [1 ]
Winkler, Dietmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, AT-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Zofingen Hosp, Competence Ctr Eating Behav Obes & Psyche, Zofingen, Switzerland
[3] Univ Freiburg, Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
关键词
Winter depression; Bright light therapy; Meta-analysis; Seasonal affective disorder; SEROTONIN TRANSPORTER BINDING; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; NEGATIVE AIR IONIZATION; BRIGHT-LIGHT; NONSEASONAL DEPRESSION; GANGLION-CELLS; CATECHOLAMINE DEPLETION; TRYPTOPHAN DEPLETION; MELATONIN SECRETION; DAWN SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1159/000502891
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Bright light therapy (BLT) has been used as a treatment for seasonal affective disorder (SAD) for over 30 years. This meta-analysis was aimed to assess the efficacy of BLT in the treatment of SAD in adults. Method: We performed a systematic literature search including randomized, single- or double-blind clinical trials investigating BLT (>= 1,000 lx, light box or light visor) against dim light (<= 400 lx) or sham/low-density negative ion generators as placebo. Only first-period data were used from crossover trials. The primary outcome was the post-treatment depression score measured by validated scales, and the secondary outcome was the rate of response to treatment. Results: A total of 19 studies finally met our predefined inclusion criteria. BLT was superior over placebo with a standardized mean difference of -0.37 (95% CI: -0.63 to -0.12) for depression ratings (18 studies, 610 patients) and a risk ratio of 1.42 (95% CI: 1.08-1.85) for response to active treatment (16 studies, 559 patients). We found no evidence for a publication bias, but moderate heterogeneity of the studies and a moderate-to-high risk of bias. Conclusions: BLT can be regarded as an effective treatment for SAD, but the available evidence stems from methodologically heterogeneous studies with small-to-medium sample sizes, necessitating larger high-quality clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 24
页数:8
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models [J].
Ades, AE ;
Lu, G ;
Higgins, JPT .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2005, 25 (06) :646-654
[2]   Bright light therapy for nonseasonal depression: Meta-analysis of clinical trials [J].
Al-Karawi, Dalia ;
Jubair, Luqman .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2016, 198 :64-71
[3]  
American Psychiatric Association, 1980, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, V3rd ed.
[4]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5, V5th, DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Am J Psychiatry, V157, P1
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Manual for the Beck depression Inventory-II
[7]   Antidepressants versus placebo for depression in primary care [J].
Arroll, B. ;
Elley, C. R. ;
Fishman, T. ;
Goodyear-Smith, F. A. ;
Kenealy, T. ;
Blashki, G. ;
Kerse, N. ;
MacGillivray, S. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (03)
[8]   Dawn simulation and bright light in the treatment of SAD: A controlled study [J].
Avery, DH ;
Eder, DN ;
Bolte, MA ;
Hellekson, CJ ;
Dunner, DL ;
Vitiello, MV ;
Prinz, PN .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 50 (03) :205-216
[9]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[10]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101