Lidocaine 10% spray to the cervix reduces pain during intrauterine device insertion: a double-blind randomised controlled trial

被引:28
作者
Aksoy, Huseyin [1 ]
Aksoy, Ulku [2 ]
Ozyurt, Sezin [2 ]
Acmaz, Gokhan [2 ]
Babayigit, Mustafa [3 ]
机构
[1] Kayseri Mil Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kayseri, Turkey
[2] Kayseri Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, TR-38010 Kayseri, Turkey
[3] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Publ Hlth, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
intrauterine devices; pain relief; lidocaine; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; MISOPROSTOL PRIOR; GEL APPLICATION; RELIEF;
D O I
10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100917
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objective Fear of pain during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion can be a barrier to widespread use of this safe and highly effective contraceptive method. Our objective was to determine the effectiveness of topical 10% lidocaine spray for pain control during IUD insertion. Methods A total of 200 subjects with the request for IUD insertion were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: lidocaine spray (n=100) and placebo (n=100). The pain experienced during the procedure was measured immediately after insertion by a standard Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) administered by a separate researcher with maintenance of allocation concealment. Results The mean pain score during the procedure was 1.01 +/- 1.20 in the lidocaine spray group and 3.23 +/- 1.60 in the placebo spray group (p<0.001). Lidocaine spray treatment significantly lowered the overall procedural pain score compared with placebo. Conclusions Significant pain reduction during IUD insertion can be achieved by using 10% lidocaine spray alone. Lidocaine spray can be accepted as a non-invasive, easy to apply and more comfortable local anaesthetic method for IUD insertion.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 87
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Higher dose cervical 2% lidocaine gel for IUD insertion: a randomized controlled trial
    Allen, Rebecca H.
    Raker, Christina
    Goyal, Vinita
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 88 (06) : 730 - 736
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  • [3] Practical advice for avoidance of pain associated with insertion of intrauterine contraceptives
    Bahamondes, Luis
    Mansour, Diana
    Fiala, Christian
    Kaunitz, Andrew M.
    Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2014, 40 (01) : 54 - 60
  • [4] Costello M F, 2005, J Obstet Gynaecol, V25, P781
  • [5] Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception
    d'Arcangues, Catherine
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 75 (06) : S2 - S7
  • [6] Vaginal misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device: an RCT
    Dijkhuizen, Kirsten
    Dekkers, Olaf M.
    Holleboom, Cas A. G.
    de Groot, Christianne J. M.
    Hellebrekers, Bart W. J.
    van Roosmalen, Godelieve J. J.
    Janssen, Catharina A. H.
    Helmerhorst, Frans M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (02) : 323 - 329
  • [7] The use of intrauterine lidocaine to minimize pain during hysterosalpingography: A randomized trial
    Frishman, GN
    Spencer, PK
    Weitzen, S
    Plosker, S
    Shafi, F
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (06) : 1261 - 1266
  • [8] GOLDSTUCK N D, 1987, Advances in Contraception, V3, P25, DOI 10.1007/BF01849250
  • [9] Comparison of interventions for pain control with tenaculum placement: a randomized clinical trial
    Goldthwaite, Lisa M.
    Baldwin, Maureen K.
    Page, Jessica
    Micks, Elizabeth A.
    Nichols, Mark D.
    Edehnan, Alison B.
    Bednarek, Paula H.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 89 (03) : 229 - 233
  • [10] Intrauterine contraception as an alternative to interval tubal sterilization - Commentary
    Grimes, David A.
    Mishell, Daniel R., Jr.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2008, 77 (01) : 6 - 9