Digital methods in a post-API environment

被引:31
作者
Perriam, Jessamy [1 ]
Birkbak, Andreas [2 ]
Freeman, Andy [3 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Sch Social Sci & Global Studies, Sociol Discipline, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
[2] Aalborg Univ, Culture & Learning, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Goldsmiths Univ London, Comp Dept, London, England
关键词
Digital methods; APIs; web scraping; ethics; Facebook; Netvizz; Twitter;
D O I
10.1080/13645579.2019.1682840
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Qualitative and mixed methods digital social research often relies on gathering and storing social media data through the use of APIs (Application Programming Interfaces). In past years this has been relatively simple, with academic developers and researchers using APIs to access data and produce visualisations and analysis of social networks and issues. In recent years, API access has become increasingly restricted and regulated by corporations at the helm of social media networks. Facebook (the corporation) has restricted academic research access to Facebook (the social media platform) along with Instagram (a Facebook-owned social media platform). Instead, they have allowed access to sources where monetisation can easily occur, in particular, marketers and advertisers. This leaves academic researchers of digital social life in a difficult situation where API related research has been curtailed. In this paper we describe some rationales and methodologies for using APIs in social research. We then introduce some of the major events in academic API use that have led to the prohibitive situation researchers now find themselves in. Finally, we discuss the methodological and ethical issues this produces for researchers and, suggest some possible steps forward for API related research.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 290
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Abildgaard M. S., 2017, EASST REV, V36, P21
[2]  
Andreas Birkbak, 2012, P 7 NORD C HUM COMP, P428, DOI DOI 10.1145/2399016.2399082
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ALGORITHMS OPPRESSIO, DOI [DOI 10.18574/NYU/9781479833641.001.0001, 10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001, DOI 10.2307/J.CTT1PWT9W5]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ARXIV180100631CSSTAT
[5]  
Bakshy E., 2012, P 21 INT C WORLD WID, P519
[6]   Programmed method: developing a toolset for capturing and analyzing tweets [J].
Borra, Erik ;
Rieder, Bernhard .
ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 66 (03) :262-278
[7]  
Bounegru L., 2018, A field guide to "fake news"and other information disorders
[8]  
Bradshaw P, 2012, SCRAPING JOURNALISTS
[9]  
Bruns A., 2018, FACEBOOK SHUTS GATE
[10]   After the "APIcalypse': social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research [J].
Bruns, Axel .
INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2019, 22 (11) :1544-1566