Culprit lesion location and outcomes in patients with multivessel disease and infarct-related cardiogenic shock: a core laboratory analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial

被引:4
|
作者
Hauguel-Moreau, Marie [1 ]
Barthelemy, Olvier [1 ]
Farhan, Serdar [2 ]
Huber, Kurt [3 ,4 ]
Rouanet, Stephanie [5 ]
Zeitouni, Michel [1 ]
Guedeney, Paul [1 ]
Hage, Georges [1 ]
Vicaut, Eric [6 ]
Zeymer, Uwe [7 ]
Desch, Steffen [8 ,9 ]
Thiele, Holger [8 ,9 ]
Montalescot, Gilles [1 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, AP HP, ACTION Study Grp, INSERM UMRS 1166,Inst Cardiol, Paris, France
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Zena & Michael A Wiener Cardiovasc Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Wilhelminen Hosp, Dept Med Cardiol & Intens Care Med, Vienna, Austria
[4] Sigmund Freud Univ, Med Sch, Vienna, Austria
[5] StatEthic, Statistician Unit, Levallois Perret, France
[6] Hop Lariboisiere, AP HP, ACTION Study Grp, Unite Rech Clin, Paris, France
[7] Heart Ctr Ludwigshafen, Dept Cardiol, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[8] Univ Leipzig, Heart Ctr Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
[9] Leipzig Heart Inst, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
cardiogenic shock; multiple vessel disease; myocardial infarction; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; ARTERY; REVASCULARIZATION; ANGIOPLASTY; SIZE;
D O I
10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00561
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Critical culprit lesion locations (CCLL) such as left main (LM) and proximal left anterior descending (LAD) are associated with worse clinical outcome in myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock (CS). Aims: We aimed to assess whether CCLL identify a subgroup of patients with poorer prognosis when presenting with CS. Methods: In the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial, a core laboratory reviewed all coronary angiograms to identify CCLL. A CCLL was defined as a culprit lesion with a >70% diameter stenosis of the LM, LM equivalent (>70% diameter stenosis of both proximal LAD and proximal circumflex), proximal LAD or last remaining vessel. We evaluated the primary study endpoint of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial according to CCLL. Results: A total of 269 (43%) out of 626 patients eligible for this analysis had a CCLL. Death or renal replacement therapy within 30 days, death within 30 days and death within one year were significantly higher in the CCLL than in the non-CCLL group (58.4% vs 43.4%, p<0.001, 55.8% vs 39.5%, p<0.001, 61.0% vs 44.5%, p<0.001, respectively). This was consistent after adjustment for baseline and angiographic characteristics. No interaction with the randomisation group (culprit lesion-only or immediate multivessel PCI) was found. Conclusions: CCLL is frequent in CS and independently associated with worse clinical outcomes irrespective of the revascularisation strategy. Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01927549
引用
收藏
页码:E418 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Culprit-only versus multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention among STEMI patients complicated by cardiogenic shock in real-world practice: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Meng-Jin
    Yang, Yue-Jin
    Jiang, Wen-Yang
    Xu, Jing
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (08) : 8628 - +
  • [42] Mechanical circulatory support for patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock: a state-of-the-art review
    Moller, Jacob Eifer
    Thiele, Holger
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Proudfoot, Alastair
    Hassager, Christian
    HEART, 2025, : 445 - 453
  • [43] Long-Term Mortality Comparison of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock and Treated With Culprit-Only or Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Vergara, Ruben
    Vignini, Elisa
    Ciabatti, Michele
    Migliorini, Angela
    Valenti, Renato
    Antoniucci, David
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2021, 22 : 10 - 15
  • [44] Meta-analysis Comparing Culprit Vessel Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
    Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
    Siddiqi, Tariq Jamal
    Usman, Muhammad Shariq
    Riaz, Haris
    Khan, Abdur Rahman
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Kalra, Ankur
    Figueredo, Vincent M.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 123 (02) : 218 - 226
  • [45] Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis
    Kolte, Dhaval
    Sardar, Partha
    Khera, Sahil
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Thiele, Holger
    Hochadel, Matthias
    Radovanovic, Dragana
    Erne, Paul
    Hambraeus, Kristina
    James, Stefan
    Claessen, Bimmer E.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Mylotte, Darren
    Garot, Philippe
    Aronow, Wilbert S.
    Owan, Theophilus
    Jain, Diwakar
    Panza, Julio A.
    Frishman, William H.
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Aronow, Herbert D.
    Abbott, J. Dawn
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (11)
  • [46] Multivessel vs. Culprit Vessel-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xiong, Bingquan
    Yang, Huiping
    Yu, Wenlong
    Zeng, Yunjie
    Han, Yue
    She, Qiang
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [47] Multivessel Versus Culprit-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
    Omer, Mohamed A.
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    Kennedy, Kevin F.
    Alkhouli, Mohamad
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Chan, Paul S.
    Spertus, John A.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (10) : 1067 - 1078
  • [48] Culprit-Only Versus Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicating Advanced Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
    Choi, Ki Hong
    Yang, Jeong Hoon
    Park, Taek Kyu
    Lee, Joo Myung
    Song, Young Bin
    Hahn, Joo-Yong
    Choi, Seung-Hyuk
    Ahn, Chul-Min
    Yu, Cheol Woong
    Park, Ik Hyun
    Jang, Woo Jin
    Kim, Hyun-Joong
    Bae, Jang-Whan
    Kwon, Sung Uk
    Lee, Hyun-Jong
    Lee, Wang Soo
    Jeong, Jin-Ok
    Park, Sang-Don
    Kang, Tae-Soo
    Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2023, 12 (10):
  • [49] Culprit Vessel Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Khalid, Muhammad Faisal
    Khan, Abdul Ahad
    Khattak, Furqan
    Ayub, Muhammad Talha
    Bagai, Jayant
    Mukherjee, Debabrata
    Helton, Thomas
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    Banerjee, Subhash
    Paul, Timir K.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (11) : 956 - 964
  • [50] Predictors of no-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention for culprit lesion with plaque rupture in infarct-related artery in patients with acute myocardial infarction
    Hong, Young Joon
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Choi, Yun Ha
    Ko, Jum Suk
    Lee, Min Goo
    Kang, Won Yu
    Lee, Shin Eun
    Kim, Soo Hyun
    Park, Keun Ho
    Sim, Doo Sun
    Yoon, Nam Sik
    Youn, Hyun Ju
    Kim, Kye Hun
    Park, Hyung Wook
    Kim, Ju Han
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    Cho, Jeong Gwan
    Park, Jong Chun
    Kang, Jung Chaee
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (01) : 36 - 44