Culprit lesion location and outcomes in patients with multivessel disease and infarct-related cardiogenic shock: a core laboratory analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial

被引:4
|
作者
Hauguel-Moreau, Marie [1 ]
Barthelemy, Olvier [1 ]
Farhan, Serdar [2 ]
Huber, Kurt [3 ,4 ]
Rouanet, Stephanie [5 ]
Zeitouni, Michel [1 ]
Guedeney, Paul [1 ]
Hage, Georges [1 ]
Vicaut, Eric [6 ]
Zeymer, Uwe [7 ]
Desch, Steffen [8 ,9 ]
Thiele, Holger [8 ,9 ]
Montalescot, Gilles [1 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, AP HP, ACTION Study Grp, INSERM UMRS 1166,Inst Cardiol, Paris, France
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Zena & Michael A Wiener Cardiovasc Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Wilhelminen Hosp, Dept Med Cardiol & Intens Care Med, Vienna, Austria
[4] Sigmund Freud Univ, Med Sch, Vienna, Austria
[5] StatEthic, Statistician Unit, Levallois Perret, France
[6] Hop Lariboisiere, AP HP, ACTION Study Grp, Unite Rech Clin, Paris, France
[7] Heart Ctr Ludwigshafen, Dept Cardiol, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[8] Univ Leipzig, Heart Ctr Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
[9] Leipzig Heart Inst, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
cardiogenic shock; multiple vessel disease; myocardial infarction; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; ARTERY; REVASCULARIZATION; ANGIOPLASTY; SIZE;
D O I
10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00561
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Critical culprit lesion locations (CCLL) such as left main (LM) and proximal left anterior descending (LAD) are associated with worse clinical outcome in myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock (CS). Aims: We aimed to assess whether CCLL identify a subgroup of patients with poorer prognosis when presenting with CS. Methods: In the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial, a core laboratory reviewed all coronary angiograms to identify CCLL. A CCLL was defined as a culprit lesion with a >70% diameter stenosis of the LM, LM equivalent (>70% diameter stenosis of both proximal LAD and proximal circumflex), proximal LAD or last remaining vessel. We evaluated the primary study endpoint of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial according to CCLL. Results: A total of 269 (43%) out of 626 patients eligible for this analysis had a CCLL. Death or renal replacement therapy within 30 days, death within 30 days and death within one year were significantly higher in the CCLL than in the non-CCLL group (58.4% vs 43.4%, p<0.001, 55.8% vs 39.5%, p<0.001, 61.0% vs 44.5%, p<0.001, respectively). This was consistent after adjustment for baseline and angiographic characteristics. No interaction with the randomisation group (culprit lesion-only or immediate multivessel PCI) was found. Conclusions: CCLL is frequent in CS and independently associated with worse clinical outcomes irrespective of the revascularisation strategy. Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01927549
引用
收藏
页码:E418 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic Impact of Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Results From the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial
    Feistritzer, Hans-Josef
    Desch, Steffen
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Fuernau, Georg
    de Waha-Thiele, Suzanne
    Dudek, Dariusz
    Huber, Kurt
    Stepinska, Janina
    Schneider, Steffen
    Ouarrak, Taoufik
    Thiele, Holger
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (06)
  • [22] Meta-Analysis Comparing Complete or Culprit Only Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Disease Presenting With Cardiogenic Shock
    Bertaina, Maurizio
    Ferraro, Ilenia
    Omede, Pierlugi
    Conrotto, Federico
    Saint-Hilary, Gaelle
    Cavender, Matthew A.
    Claessen, Bimmer E.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Frea, Simone
    Usmiani, Tullio
    Marra, Walter Grosso
    Pennone, Mauro
    Moretti, Claudio
    D'Amico, Maurizio
    D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 122 (10) : 1661 - 1669
  • [23] Microaxial Flow Pump Use and Renal Outcomes in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Secondary Analysis of the DanGer Shock Trial
    Zweck, Elric
    Hassager, Christian
    Beske, Rasmus P.
    Jensen, Lisette O.
    Eiskjaer, Hans
    Mangner, Norman
    Polzin, Amin
    Schulze, P. Christian
    Skurk, Carsten
    Nordbeck, Peter
    Clemmensen, Peter
    Panoulas, Vasileios
    Zimmer, Sebastian
    Schaefer, Andreas
    Kelm, Malte
    Engstrom, Thomas
    Holmvang, Lene
    Junker, Anders
    Schmidt, Henrik
    Terkelsen, Christian J.
    Linke, Axel
    Westenfeld, Ralf
    Moller, Jacob E.
    DanGer Shock Investigators
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150 (25) : 1990 - 2003
  • [24] Effects of ON-Hours Versus OFF-Hours Admission on Outcome in Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Results From the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial
    Sag, Can Martin
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Ouarrak, Taoufik
    Schneider, Steffen
    Montalescot, Gilles
    Huber, Kurt
    Fuernau, Georg
    Freund, Anne
    Feistritzer, Hans-Josef
    Desch, Steffen
    Thiele, Holger
    Maier, Lars S.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (09) : E009562
  • [25] Different Mechanical Circulatory Support Strategies for Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock A Subanalysis of the ECLS-SHOCK Trial
    Feistritzer, Hans-Josef
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Ouarrak, Taoufik
    Akin, Ibrahim
    Rassaf, Tienush
    Lehmann, Ralf
    Eitel, Ingo
    Seidler, Tim
    Skurk, Carsten
    Clemmensen, Peter
    Voigt, Ingo
    Seyfarth, Melchior
    Linke, Axel
    Tigges, Eike
    Jung, Christian
    Lauten, Philipp
    Poess, Janine
    Schneider, Steffen
    Desch, Steffen
    Freund, Anne
    Thiele, Holger
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2025, 18 (06) : 691 - 701
  • [26] Prognostic Impact of Active Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction, Results from the Culprit-Shock Trial
    Feistritzer, Hans-Josef
    Desch, Steffen
    Freund, Anne
    Poess, Janine
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Ouarrak, Taoufik
    Schneider, Steffen
    De Waha-Thiele, Suzanne
    Fuernau, Georg
    Eitel, Ingo
    Noc, Marko
    Stepinska, Janina
    Huber, Kurt
    Thiele, Holger
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (06) : 1 - 14
  • [27] Outcomes of multivessel vs culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Evidence from an updated meta-analysis
    Kundu, Amartya
    Sardar, Partha
    Kakouros, Nikolaos
    Malhotra, Rohit
    Kolte, Dhaval
    Feldman, Dmitriy N.
    Abbott, J. D.
    Fisher, Daniel Z.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 94 (01) : 70 - 81
  • [28] C-reactive protein levels and outcomes in infarct-related cardiogenic shock: data from the ECLS-SHOCK trial
    Schupp, Tobias
    Thiele, Holger
    Rassaf, Tienush
    Mahabadi, Amir Abbas
    Lehmann, Ralf
    Eitel, Ingo
    Skurk, Carsten
    Clemmensen, Peter
    Hennersdorf, Marcus
    Voigt, Ingo
    Linke, Axel
    Tigges, Eike
    Nordbeck, Peter
    Jung, Christian
    Lauten, Philipp
    Feistritzer, Hans-Josef
    Buske, Maria
    Poess, Janine
    Ouarrak, Taoufik
    Schneider, Steffen
    Behnes, Michael
    Duerschmied, Daniel
    Desch, Steffen
    Freund, Anne
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Akin, Ibrahim
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2025, 14 (02) : 59 - 70
  • [29] Prognosis of cardiogenic shock secondary to culprit left main coronary artery lesion-related myocardial infarction
    Galvan-Roman, Francisco
    Fernandez-Herrero, Ignacio
    Ariza-Sole, Albert
    Carlos Sanchez-Salado, Jose
    Puerto, Elena
    Lorente, Victoria
    Gomez-Lara, Josep
    Martin-Asenjo, Roberto
    Gomez-Hospital, Joan A.
    Comin-Colet, Josep
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2023, 10 (01): : 111 - 120
  • [30] Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Waha, Suzanne
    Jobs, Alexander
    Eitel, Ingo
    Poess, Janine
    Stiermaier, Thomas
    Meyer-Saraei, Roza
    Fuernau, Georg
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Desch, Steffen
    Thiele, Holger
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2018, 7 (01) : 28 - 37