Initial Referring Physician and Radiologist Experience with Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System

被引:7
作者
Bunch, Paul M. [1 ,7 ]
Meegalla, Nuwan T. [2 ,7 ]
Abualruz, Abdul-Rahman [1 ,7 ]
Frizzell, Bart A. [3 ,7 ]
Patwa, Hafiz S. [4 ,7 ]
Porosnicu, Mercedes [5 ,7 ]
Williams, Daniel W. [1 ,7 ]
Aiken, Ashley H. [6 ,7 ]
Hughes, Ryan T. [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27101 USA
[2] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Surg, Winston Salem, NC 27101 USA
[3] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Winston Salem, NC 27101 USA
[4] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Winston Salem, NC 27101 USA
[5] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Winston Salem, NC 27101 USA
[6] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Imaging Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Wake Forest Sch Med, Winston Salem, NC 27101 USA
关键词
Head and neck cancer; structured reporting; neck CT; surveillance imaging; quality improvement;
D O I
10.1002/lary.29765
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/Hypothesis Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) is a radiology reporting system developed for head and neck cancer surveillance imaging, using standardized terminology, numeric levels of suspicion, and linked management recommendations. Through a multidisciplinary, interdepartmental quality improvement initiative, we implemented NI-RADS for the reporting of head and neck cancer surveillance CT. Our objective is to summarize our initial experience from the standpoints of head and neck cancer providers and radiologists. Study Design Quality improvement study. Methods Before and 3 months post-implementation, surveys were offered to referring physicians (n = 21 pre-adoption; 22 post-adoption) and radiologists (n = 17 pre- and post-adoption). NI-RADS utilization was assessed over time. Results Survey response rates were 62% (13/21) and 73% (16/22) for referring physicians pre- and post-adoption, respectively, and 94% (16/17) for radiologists pre- and post-adoption. Among post-adoption provider respondents, 100% (16/16) strongly agreed or agreed with "I want our radiologists to continue using NI-RADS," "The NI-RADS numerical rating of radiologic suspicion is helpful," and "The language and style of NI-RADS neck CT reports are clear and understandable." Among radiologist respondents, 88% (14/16) strongly agreed or agreed with "NI-RADS improves consistency among our radiologists in the reporting of surveillance neck CTs." Radiologist NI-RADS utilization increased over time (46% month 1; 72% month 3). Conclusions Most referring physicians and radiologists preferred NI-RADS. Head and neck cancer providers indicated that NI-RADS reports are clear, understandable, direct, and helpful in guiding clinical management. Radiologists indicated that NI-RADS improves radiologist consistency in the reporting of surveillance neck CT, and radiologists increasingly used NI-RADS over time. Level of Evidence Level 4 Laryngoscope, 2021
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 355
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[21]   Radiologist Preferences, Agreement, and Variability in Phrases Used to Convey Diagnostic Certainty in Radiology Reports [J].
Shinagare, Atul B. ;
Lacson, Ronilda ;
Boland, Giles W. ;
Wang, Aijia ;
Silverman, Stuart G. ;
Mayo-Smith, William W. ;
Khorasani, Ramin .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 16 (04) :458-464
[22]   Negative Predictive Value of NI-RADS Category 2 in the First Posttreatment FDG-PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma [J].
Wangaryattawanich, P. ;
Branstetter, B. F. ;
Hughes, M. ;
Clump, D. A., II ;
Heron, D. E. ;
Rath, T. J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2018, 39 (10) :1884-1888
[23]   Variability in Interpretation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pediatric Sacroiliac Joint [J].
Weiss, Pamela F. ;
Brandon, Timothy G. ;
Bohnsack, John ;
Heshin-Bekenstein, Merav ;
Francavilla, Michael L. ;
Jaremko, Jacob L. ;
Liao, Lester ;
McHugh, Anne ;
Oberle, Edward J. ;
Rumsey, Dax ;
Srinivasalu, Hemalatha ;
Stoll, Matthew L. ;
Chauvin, Nancy A. .
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2021, 73 (06) :841-848