Investigating 5-Level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) Values Based on Preferences of Patients With Heart Disease

被引:6
作者
Gandhi, Mihir [1 ,2 ,3 ]
San Tan, Ru [4 ]
Lim, Shir Lynn [5 ]
Rand, Kim [6 ,7 ]
Lam, Carolyn S. P. [4 ]
Luo, Nan [8 ]
Cheung, Yin Bun [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Clin Res Inst, Biostat, 06-01,23 Rochester Pk, Singapore 139234, Singapore
[2] Duke NUS Med Sch, Ctr Quantitat Med, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Tampere Univ, Ctr Child Hlth Res, Tampere, Finland
[4] Natl Heart Ctr Singapore, Dept Cardiol, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Akershus Univ Hosp, Hlth Serv Res Ctr, Lorenskog, Norway
[7] Maths Hlth BV, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[8] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
cardiovascular disease; EQ-5D; EQ-5D-5L; heart disease; patient preference; preference; utility; value set; OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE; VALUE SET; HEALTH; VALUATION; QLU-C10D; ASIANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2021.09.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Several studies have shown that patients with heart disease value hypothetical health states differently from the general population. We aimed to investigate the health preferences of patients with heart disease and develop a value set for the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) based on these patient preferences.Methods: Patients with confirmed heart disease were recruited from 2 hospitals in Singapore. A total of 86 EQ-5D-5L health states (10 per patient) were valued using a composite time trade-off method according to the international valuation protocol for EQ-5D-5L; 20-parameter linear models and 8-parameter cross-attribute level effects models with and without an N45 term (indicating whether any health state dimension at level 4 or 5 existed) were estimated. Each model included patient-specific random intercepts. Model performance was evaluated for out-of-sample and in-sample predictive accuracy in terms of root mean square error. The discriminative ability of the utility values was assessed using heart disease-related functional classes.Results: A total of 576 patients were included in the analysis. The preferred model, with the lowest out-of-sample root mean square error, was a 20-parameter linear model including N45. Predicted utility values ranged from 20.727 for the worst state to 1 for full health; the value for the second-best state was 0.981. Utility values demonstrated good discriminative ability in differentiating among patients of varied functional classes.Conclusions: An EQ-5D-5L value set representing the preferences of patients with heart disease was developed. The value set could be used for patient-centric economic evaluation and health-related quality of life assessment for patients with heart disease.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 460
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]   Experience-Based Values: A Framework for Classifying Different Types of Experience in Health Valuation Research [J].
Cubi-Molla, Patricia ;
Shah, Koonal ;
Burstrom, Kristina .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2018, 11 (03) :253-270
[12]   Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England [J].
Devlin, Nancy J. ;
Shah, Koonal K. ;
Feng, Yan ;
Mulhern, Brendan ;
van Hout, Ben .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2018, 27 (01) :7-22
[13]   Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states [J].
Dolan, P .
MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (11) :1095-1108
[14]   Should health technology assessment be more patient centric? If so, how? [J].
Drummond, Michael ;
Torbica, Aleksandra ;
Tarricone, Rosanna .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2020, 21 (08) :1117-1120
[15]   Sample size determination for EQ-5D-5L value set studies [J].
Gandhi, Mihir ;
Xu, Ying ;
Luo, Nan ;
Cheung, Yin Bun .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (12) :3365-3376
[16]   Comparison of health state values derived from patients and individuals from the general population [J].
Gandhi, Mihir ;
Tan, Ru San ;
Ng, Raymond ;
Choo, Su Pin ;
Chia, Whay Kuang ;
Toh, Chee Keong ;
Lam, Carolyn ;
Lee, Phong Teck ;
Latt, Nang Khaing Zar ;
Rand-Hendriksen, Kim ;
Cheung, Yin Bun ;
Luo, Nan .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (12) :3353-3363
[17]   Do chronic disease patients value generic health states differently from individuals with no chronic disease? A case of a multicultural Asian population [J].
Gandhi, Mihir ;
Thumboo, Julian ;
Luo, Nan ;
Wee, Hwee-Lin ;
Cheung, Yin-Bun .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2015, 13
[18]   Whom should we ask? A systematic literature review of the arguments regarding the most accurate source of information for valuation of health states [J].
Helgesson, Gert ;
Ernstsson, Olivia ;
Astrom, Mimmi ;
Burstrom, Kristina .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (06) :1465-1482
[19]   Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study [J].
Janssen, M. F. ;
Pickard, A. Simon ;
Golicki, Dominik ;
Gudex, Claire ;
Niewada, Maciej ;
Scalone, Luciana ;
Swinburn, Paul ;
Busschbach, Jan .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (07) :1717-1727
[20]   QLU-C10D: a health state classification system for a multi-attribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 [J].
King, M. T. ;
Costa, D. S. J. ;
Aaronson, N. K. ;
Brazier, J. E. ;
Cella, D. F. ;
Fayers, P. M. ;
Grimison, P. ;
Janda, M. ;
Kemmler, G. ;
Norman, R. ;
Pickard, A. S. ;
Rowen, D. ;
Velikova, G. ;
Young, T. A. ;
Viney, R. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (03) :625-636