Comparison of risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in department of Veterans Affairs hospitals and selected university medical centers: General surgical operations in men

被引:70
作者
Henderson, William G.
Khuri, Shukri F.
Mosca, Cecilia
Fink, Aaron S.
Hutter, Matthew M.
Neumayer, Leigh A.
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Healthcare Syst, West Roxbury, MA USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Dept Vet Affairs, Natl Surg Qual Improvement Program, Off Patient Care Serv, Aurora, CO USA
[5] Atlanta VA Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Emory Univ, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[7] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[8] George E Whalen Salt Lake City VA Healthcare Syst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[9] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.068
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We used data from the Patient Safety in Surgery Study to compare patient populations, operative characteristics, and unadjusted and risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity between the Veterans Affairs (VA)(n=94,098) and private (n=18,399) sectors for general surgery operations in men. Study Design: This is a prospective cohort study. Trained nurses collected preoperative risk factors, operative variables, and 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity outcomes in male patients undergoing major general surgery operations at 128 VA medical centers and 14 university medical centers from October 1, 2001, to September 30, 2004. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify preoperative predictors of postoperative mortality and morbidity. An indicator variable for VA versus private-sector medical center was added to the model to determine if risk-adjusted outcomes were significantly different in the two systems. Results: The unadjusted 30-day mortality rate was higher in the VA compared with the private sector (2.62% versus 2.03%, p=0.0002); unadjusted morbidity rate was lower in the VA compared with the private sector (12.24% versus 13.99%, p<0.0001). After risk adjustment, odds ratio for mortality for the VA versus private sector was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.08-1.41). For morbidity after risk adjustment, the indicator variable for health-care system just missed statistical significance (p=0.0585). Thirty-day postoperative mortality was comparable in the VA and private sector for very common operations but was higher in the VA for less common, more complex operations. Conclusions: In general surgery operations in men, the VA appeared to have a higher risk-adjusted mortality rate compared with the private sector, but differences in mortality ascertainment in the two sectors might account for some of this effect. The higher mortality in the VA could be the result of higher mortality in the less common, more complex operations. There is a trend toward lower risk-adjusted morbidity in the VA compared with the private sector.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1114
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at a Veterans Affairs and high-volume academic facilities: a comparison of institutional outcomes
    Alami, RS
    Morton, JM
    Sanchez, BR
    Curet, MJ
    Wren, SM
    Safadi, BY
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (05) : 821 - 825
  • [2] Comparative analysis of outcome following liver transplantation in US veterans
    Austin, GL
    Sasaki, AW
    Zaman, A
    Rabkin, JM
    Olyaei, A
    Ruimy, R
    Orloff, SL
    Ham, J
    Rosen, HR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (05) : 788 - 795
  • [3] Daley J, 1997, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V185, P328, DOI 10.1016/S1072-7515(01)00939-5
  • [4] Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: Site visit assessment of process and structure
    Daley, J
    Forbes, MG
    Young, GJ
    Charns, MP
    Gibbs, JO
    Hur, K
    Henderson, W
    Khuri, SF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1997, 185 (04) : 341 - 351
  • [5] Assessment of the reliability of data collected for the department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Davis, Chester L.
    Pierce, John R.
    Henderson, William
    Spencer, C. David
    Tyler, Christine
    Langberg, Robert
    Swafford, Jennan
    Felan, Gladys S.
    Kearns, Martha A.
    Booker, Brigitte
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (04) : 550 - 560
  • [6] The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals - Initial demonstration of feasibility
    Fink, AS
    Campbell, DA
    Mentzer, RM
    Henderson, WG
    Daley, J
    Bannister, J
    Hur, K
    Khuri, SF
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (03) : 344 - 354
  • [7] Heck D A, 1992, J Arthroplasty, V7, P93, DOI 10.1016/0883-5403(92)90038-R
  • [8] HENDERSON W, 2002, TOP HLTH INF MANAGE, V23, P22
  • [9] Institute of Medicine, 2002, COMM ENH FED HEALTHC
  • [10] The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP - The first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care
    Khuri, SF
    Daley, J
    Henderson, W
    Hur, K
    Demakis, J
    Aust, JB
    Chong, V
    Fabri, PJ
    Gibbs, JO
    Grover, F
    Hammermeister, K
    Irvin, G
    McDonald, G
    Passaro, E
    Phillips, L
    Scamman, F
    Spencer, J
    Stemple, JF
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 228 (04) : 491 - 504