The Effects of Optical Illusions in Perception and Action in Peripersonal and Extrapersonal Space

被引:3
作者
Shim, Jaeho [1 ]
van der Kamp, John [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Univ, 1312 S 5th St,OBP 97313, Waco, TX 76798 USA
[2] van der Boechrostr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
binocular vision; perception; perception or action; and spatial vision; BINOCULAR VISION; PREHENSION; MOVEMENTS; INFORMATION; TARGET; DELAY; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0301006617707697
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
While the two visual system hypothesis tells a fairly compelling story about perception and action in peripersonal space (i.e., within arm's reach), its validity for extrapersonal space is very limited and highly controversial. Hence, the present purpose was to assess whether perception and action differences in peripersonal space hold in extrapersonal space and are modulated by the same factors. To this end, the effects of an optic illusion in perception and action in both peripersonal and extrapersonal space were compared in three groups that threw balls toward a target at a distance under different target eccentricity (i.e., with the target fixated and in peripheral field), viewing (i.e., binocular and monocular viewing), and delay conditions (i.e., immediate and delayed action). The illusory bias was smaller in action than in perception in peripersonal space, but this difference was significantly reduced in extrapersonal space, primarily because of a weakening bias in perception. No systematic modulation of target eccentricity, viewing, and delay arose. The findings suggest that the two visual system hypothesis is also valid for extra personal space.
引用
收藏
页码:1118 / 1126
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Bennett D. J., 2010, PSYCHE, V16, P98
[2]   Visually guided pointing, the Muller-Lyer illusion, and the functional interpretation of the dorsal-ventral split: Conclusions from 33 independent studies [J].
Bruno, Nicola ;
Bernardis, Paolo ;
Gentilucci, Maurizio .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2008, 32 (03) :423-437
[3]   When is grasping affected by the Muller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review [J].
Bruno, Nicola ;
Franz, Volker H. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2009, 47 (06) :1421-1433
[4]  
Caljouw SR, 2010, RES Q EXERCISE SPORT, V81, P410
[5]   DID THROWING STONES SHAPE HOMINID BRAIN EVOLUTION [J].
CALVIN, WH .
ETHOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1982, 3 (03) :115-124
[6]   Dissociations between vision for perception and vision for action depend on the relative availability of egocentric and allocentric information [J].
Canal-Bruland, Rouwen ;
Voorwald, Frank ;
Wielaard, Kirsten ;
van der Kamp, John .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2013, 75 (06) :1206-1214
[7]  
Cutting JamesE., 1995, PERCEPTION SPACE MOT, V2nd
[8]   Eye position tunes the contribution of allocentric and egocentric information to target localization in human goal-directed arm movements [J].
Gentilucci, M ;
Daprati, E ;
Gangitano, M ;
Toni, I .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1997, 222 (02) :123-126
[9]   Evaluating Muller-Lyer effects using single fin-set configurations [J].
Greene, E ;
Nelson, B .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1997, 59 (02) :293-312
[10]   Response delay and spatial representation in pointing movements [J].
Hay, Laurette ;
Redon, Christine .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2006, 408 (03) :194-198