Dosimetry of an extracapsular anulus following permanent prostate Brachytherapy

被引:19
作者
Merrick, Gregory S.
Butler, Wayne M.
Wallner, Kent E.
Allen, Zachariah A.
Kurko, Brian
Anderson, Richard L.
Grammer, Robert
Galbreath, Robert W.
True, Lawrence
Adamovich, Edward
机构
[1] Wheeling Jesuit Hosp, Schiffler Canc Ctr, Wheeling, WV USA
[2] Wheeling Hosp, Dept Pathol, Wheeling, WV 26003 USA
[3] Puget Sound Healthcare Corp, Grp Hlth Cooperat, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Ohio Univ Eastern, St Clairsville, OH USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Pathol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2007年 / 30卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate cancer; brachytherapy; treatment margins; dosimetry;
D O I
10.1097/01.coc.0000258110.11024.c4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Recent studies have suggested that extracapsular brachytherapy treatment margins correlate with biochemical control. It is likely that volumetric geographic dosimetric parameters will be more robust than selected radial measurements. Accordingly, we evaluated extracapsular volumetric dosimetric parameters in low-risk patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 263 low-risk prostate cancer patients randomized to Pd-103 versus I-125 were implanted with a brachytherapy target volume consisting of the prostate with a 5-min periprostatic margin. The median follow-up was 4.2 years. All patients were implanted at least 3 years prior to analysis. Within 2 hours of implantation, an axial CT was obtained for postimplant dosimetry. A 5-mm three-dimensional periprostatic anulus was constructed around the prostate and evaluated in its entirety and in 90 degrees segments. Prostate and anular dosimetric parameters consisted of V-100/V-150/V-200 and D-90. Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) was defined as a PSA <= 0.50 ng/mL after nadir. Results: The Pd-103 and I-125 arms were well-matched in terms of clinical, biochemical, and pathologic presentation. Six-year bPFS was 96.8% versus 99.2% for I-125 versus Pd-103 (P = 0.149). The most recent median posttreatment PSA was <0.04 ng/mL for both isotopes. No significant differences in postoperative anular doses were discerned between bPFS and failed patients. Conclusions: A postimplant 5-mm, three-dimensional periprostatic anulus provides substantial information regarding dosimetric coverage. However, with a median follow-up of 4.2 years, such volumetric and geographic parameters have not proven useful in predicting biochemical outcome in low-risk patients.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 233
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Isotope choice and the effect of edema on prostate brachytherapy dosimetry [J].
Butler, WM ;
Merrick, GS ;
Dorsey, AT ;
Lief, JH .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (05) :1067-1075
[2]   Can extraprostatic extension be treated by prostate brachytherapy? An analysis based on postimplant dosimetry [J].
Butzbach, D ;
Waterman, FM ;
Dicker, AP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (05) :1196-1199
[3]  
CHOI S, 2004, CANCER J, V3, P175
[4]   Defining the implant treatment volume for patients with low risk prostate cancer: Does the anterior base need to be treated? [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Davis, A ;
Vargas, SO ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Jiroutek, M ;
Richie, JP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (03) :587-590
[5]  
Davis B J, 2000, Tech Urol, V6, P70
[6]  
Davis BJ, 1999, CANCER, V85, P2630
[7]   DOSE EFFECTS OF SEEDS PLACEMENT DEVIATIONS FROM PRE-PLANNED POSITIONS IN ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PROSTATE IMPLANTS [J].
DAWSON, JE ;
WU, T ;
ROY, T ;
GU, JY ;
KIM, H .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 32 (03) :268-270
[8]   Differences in tumor core distribution between palpable and nonpalpable prostate tumors in patients diagnosed using extensive transperineal ultrasound-guided template prostate biopsy [J].
Demura, T ;
Hioka, T ;
Furuno, T ;
Kaneta, T ;
Gotoda, H ;
Muraoka, S ;
Sato, T ;
Mochizuki, T ;
Nagamori, S ;
Shinohara, N .
CANCER, 2005, 103 (09) :1826-1832
[9]  
Han B, 2000, Semin Urol Oncol, V18, P137
[10]   Biochemical outcomes after prostate brachytherapy with 5-year minimal follow-up: Importance of patient selection and implant quality [J].
Kollmeier, MA ;
Stock, RG ;
Stone, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (03) :645-653