Manipulation of the Bitcoin market: an agent-based study

被引:11
作者
Fratric, Peter [1 ]
Sileno, Giovanni [1 ]
Klous, Sander [1 ]
van Engers, Tom [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Informat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Leibniz Inst, TNO, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Agent-based modelling; Cryptocurrency; Market manipulation; Liquidity; Bitcoin; ORDER BOOK; TAX EVASION; LIQUIDITY; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1186/s40854-022-00364-3
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Fraudulent actions of a trader or a group of traders can cause substantial disturbance to the market, both directly influencing the price of an asset or indirectly by misinforming other market participants. Such behavior can be a source of systemic risk and increasing distrust for the market participants, consequences that call for viable countermeasures. Building on the foundations provided by the extant literature, this study aims to design an agent-based market model capable of reproducing the behavior of the Bitcoin market during the time of an alleged Bitcoin price manipulation that occurred between 2017 and early 2018. The model includes the mechanisms of a limit order book market and several agents associated with different trading strategies, including a fraudulent agent, initialized from empirical data and who performs market manipulation. The model is validated with respect to the Bitcoin price as well as the amount of Bitcoins obtained by the fraudulent agent and the traded volume. Simulation results provide a satisfactory fit to historical data. Several price dips and volume anomalies are explained by the actions of the fraudulent trader, completing the known body of evidence extracted from blockchain activity. The model suggests that the presence of the fraudulent agent was essential to obtain Bitcoin price development in the given time period; without this agent, it would have been very unlikely that the price had reached the heights as it did in late 2017. The insights gained from the model, especially the connection between liquidity and manipulation efficiency, unfold a discussion on how to prevent illicit behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [11] Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators
    Bodo, Balazs
    [J]. NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2021, 23 (09) : 2668 - 2690
  • [12] Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance
    Boehme, Rainer
    Christin, Nicolas
    Edelman, Benjamin
    Moore, Tyler
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 29 (02) : 213 - 238
  • [13] Bornholdt S., 2014, DO BITCOINS MAKE WOR
  • [14] Price discovery on Bitcoin exchanges
    Brandvold, Morten
    Molnar, Peter
    Vagstad, Kristian
    Valstad, Ole Christian Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2015, 36 : 18 - 35
  • [15] A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues
    Casino, Fran
    Dasaklis, Thomas K.
    Patsakis, Constantinos
    [J]. TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2019, 36 : 55 - 81
  • [16] Chan S, 2017, J RISK FINANC MANAG, V10, DOI 10.3390/jrfm10020012
  • [17] Varieties of agents in agent-based computational economics: A historical and an interdisciplinary perspective
    Chen, Shu-Heng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2012, 36 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [18] Detecting "Pump & Dump Schemes" on Cryptocurrency Market Using An Improved Apriori Algorithm
    Chen, Weili
    Xu, YueJin
    Zheng, Zibin
    Zhou, Yuren
    Yang, Jianxun Eileen
    Bian, Jing
    [J]. 2019 13TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE-ORIENTED SYSTEM ENGINEERING (SOSE) / 10TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON JOINT CLOUD COMPUTING (JCC) / IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON CLOUD COMPUTING IN ROBOTIC SYSTEMS (CCRS), 2019, : 293 - 298
  • [19] Chohan U., 2018, OV REG CRYPT BITLICE, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3133342
  • [20] Liquidity and market efficiency
    Chordia, Tarun
    Roll, Richard
    Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 87 (02) : 249 - 268