Manipulation of the Bitcoin market: an agent-based study

被引:11
作者
Fratric, Peter [1 ]
Sileno, Giovanni [1 ]
Klous, Sander [1 ]
van Engers, Tom [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Informat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Leibniz Inst, TNO, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Agent-based modelling; Cryptocurrency; Market manipulation; Liquidity; Bitcoin; ORDER BOOK; TAX EVASION; LIQUIDITY; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1186/s40854-022-00364-3
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Fraudulent actions of a trader or a group of traders can cause substantial disturbance to the market, both directly influencing the price of an asset or indirectly by misinforming other market participants. Such behavior can be a source of systemic risk and increasing distrust for the market participants, consequences that call for viable countermeasures. Building on the foundations provided by the extant literature, this study aims to design an agent-based market model capable of reproducing the behavior of the Bitcoin market during the time of an alleged Bitcoin price manipulation that occurred between 2017 and early 2018. The model includes the mechanisms of a limit order book market and several agents associated with different trading strategies, including a fraudulent agent, initialized from empirical data and who performs market manipulation. The model is validated with respect to the Bitcoin price as well as the amount of Bitcoins obtained by the fraudulent agent and the traded volume. Simulation results provide a satisfactory fit to historical data. Several price dips and volume anomalies are explained by the actions of the fraudulent trader, completing the known body of evidence extracted from blockchain activity. The model suggests that the presence of the fraudulent agent was essential to obtain Bitcoin price development in the given time period; without this agent, it would have been very unlikely that the price had reached the heights as it did in late 2017. The insights gained from the model, especially the connection between liquidity and manipulation efficiency, unfold a discussion on how to prevent illicit behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Abel GJ, 2015, R J, V7, P15
  • [2] Ali R., 2014, BANK ENGLAND Q REV, V54, P276
  • [3] Incorporating Contagion in Portfolio Credit Risk Models Using Network Theory
    Anagnostou, Ioannis
    Sourabh, Sumit
    Kandhai, Drona
    [J]. COMPLEXITY, 2018,
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, INT C MACH LEARN PML
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1994, Continuous Univariate Distributions, DOI DOI 10.1016/0167-9473(96)90015-8
  • [6] Cryptocurrencies Emerging Threats and Defensive Mechanisms: A Systematic Literature Review
    Badawi, Emad
    Jourdan, Guy-Vincent
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 200021 - 200037
  • [7] The inefficiency of Bitcoin revisited: A dynamic approach
    Bariviera, Aurelio F.
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2017, 161 : 1 - 4
  • [8] A multi agent model for the limit order book dynamics
    Bartolozzi, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2010, 78 (02) : 265 - 273
  • [9] A percolation model for the emergence of the Bitcoin Lightning Network
    Bartolucci, Silvia
    Caccioli, Fabio
    Vivo, Pierpaolo
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [10] A Short Introduction to the World of Cryptocurrencies
    Berentsen, Aleksander
    Schaer, Fabian
    [J]. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST LOUIS REVIEW, 2018, 100 (01): : 1 - 16