A weighted rough set based fuzzy axiomatic design approach for the selection of AM processes

被引:42
作者
Zheng, Pai [1 ]
Wang, Yuanbin [1 ]
Xu, Xun [1 ]
Xie, Sheng Quan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Mech Engn, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Rough set; Fuzzy axiomatic design; Preference graph; Multi-attribute decision making; Relative importance rating; Additive manufacturing; PROTOTYPING PROCESS SELECTION; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; CRITERIA; PROPOSAL; RANKING; MODEL; QFD;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-016-9890-8
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing, as an enabling technology for mass customization or personalization, has been developed rapidly in recent years. Various design tools, materials, machines and service bureaus can be found in the market. Clearly, the choices are abundant, but users can be easily confused as to which AM process they should use. This paper first reviews the existing multi-attribute decision-making methods for AM process selection and assesses their suitability with regard to two aspects, preference rating flexibility and performance evaluation objectivity. We propose that an approach that is capable of handling incomplete attribute information and objective assessment within inherent data has advantages over other approaches. Based on this proposition, this paper proposes a weighted preference graph method for personalized preference evaluation and a rough set based fuzzy axiomatic design approach for performance evaluation and the selection of appropriate AM processes. An example based on the previous research work of AM machine selection is given to validate its robustness for the priori articulation of AM process selection decision support.
引用
收藏
页码:1977 / 1990
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[11]   Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods [J].
Chan, LK ;
Kao, HP ;
Ng, A ;
Wu, ML .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1999, 37 (11) :2499-2518
[12]   Ordering based decision making - A survey [J].
Chen, Shuwei ;
Liu, Jun ;
Wang, Hui ;
Augusto, Juan Carlos .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2013, 14 (04) :521-531
[13]   Combining the analytic hierarchy process and quality function deployment for a location decision from a requirement perspective [J].
Chuang, PT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 18 (11) :842-849
[14]   A comparison of rapid prototyping techniques used for wind tunnel model fabrication [J].
Chuk, Raymond N. ;
Thomson, Vincent J. .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 1998, 4 (04) :185-196
[15]  
Cooke A., 2012, P 2012 ANN INT SOL F, P6
[16]   Decision support in concurrent engineering -: The utility-based selection decision support problem [J].
Fernández, MG ;
Seepersad, CC ;
Rosen, DW ;
Allen, JK ;
Mistree, F .
CONCURRENT ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2005, 13 (01) :13-27
[17]   Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure [J].
Figueira, J ;
Roy, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 139 (02) :317-326
[18]   Customer requirement prioritization on QFD: a new proposal based on the generalized Yager's algorithm [J].
Franceschini, Fiorenzo ;
Maisano, Domenico ;
Mastrogiacomo, Luca .
RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2015, 26 (02) :171-187
[19]  
Ghazy M.M., 2012, THESIS
[20]  
Gibson I, 2010, ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES: RAPID PROTOTYPING TO DIRECT DIGITAL MANUFACTURING, P283, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9_11