Ponseti Method Compared with Surgical Treatment of Clubfoot A Prospective Comparison

被引:65
|
作者
Halanski, Matthew A. [1 ]
Davison, Jan E. [1 ]
Huang, Jen-Chen [1 ]
Walker, Cameron G. [1 ]
Walsh, Stewart J. [1 ]
Crawford, Haemish A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Starship Childrens Hlth, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
2 DIFFERENT PROTOCOLS; IDIOPATHIC CLUBFOOT; FOLLOW-UP; CONGENITAL CLUBFOOT; FOOT; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; RELEASE; DEFORMITY; CLUBFEET;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.H.01560
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current trends in the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot have shifted from extensive surgical release to more conservative techniques. The purpose of the present study was to prospectively compare the results of the Ponseti method with those of surgical releases for the correction of clubfoot deformity. Methods: We prospectively compared patients who had idiopathic clubfoot deformities that were treated at a single institution either with the Ponseti method or with below-the-knee casting followed by surgical release. The clinical records of the patients with a minimum duration of follow-up of two years were reviewed. All scheduled and completed operative interventions and associated complications were recorded. Results: Fifty-five patients with eighty-six clubfeet were treated; forty feet were included in the group that was treated with the Ponseti method, and forty-six feet were included in the group that was treated with below-the-knee casts followed by surgery (with three of these feet requiring casting only). There was no difference between the groups in terms of sex, ethnicity, age at the time of first casting, pretreatment Pirani score (average, 5.2 in both groups), or family history. The average number of casts was six in the Ponseti group and thirteen in the surgical group. Of the feet that were treated with below-the-knee casts, forty-three underwent surgery, with forty-two undergoing major surgery (posterior release [eleven] or posteromedial release [thirty-one]). In the Ponseti group, fourteen feet required fifteen operative interventions for recurrences, with only one foot requiring revision surgery. Four of these fifteen were major (necessitating posterior [one] or posteromedial release [three]) while eleven were minor. Thirteen feet in the surgical group required fourteen surgical revisions. Two postoperative complications were seen in each group. Conclusions: While both cohorts had a relatively high recurrence rate, the Ponseti cohort was managed with significantly less operative intervention and required less revision surgery. The Ponseti method has now been adopted as the primary treatment for clubfoot at our institution. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 278
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Ponseti versus Surgical Treatment for Idiopathic Clubfoot: A Short-term Preliminary Report
    Zwick, Ernst B.
    Kraus, Tanja
    Maizen, Claudia
    Steinwender, Gerhardt
    Linhart, Wolfgang E.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (10) : 2668 - 2676
  • [2] Ponseti method for treatment of idiopathic clubfoot
    Heck, K.
    Heck, A.
    Placzek, R.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2016, 28 (06): : 449 - 471
  • [3] Clubfoot treatment through the ages. The Ponseti method in comparison to other conservative approaches and operative procedures
    Delbrueck, H.
    Schaltenbrand, M.
    Schroeder, S.
    Rauschmann, M.
    Schwenninger, C.
    ORTHOPADE, 2013, 42 (06): : 427 - 433
  • [4] Ponseti method is superior to surgical treatment in clubfoot - Long-term, randomized, prospective trial
    Svehlik, Martin
    Floh, Ulrike
    Steinwender, Gerhardt
    Sperl, Matthias
    Novak, Michael
    Kraus, Tanja
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2017, 58 : 346 - 351
  • [5] Treatment of Clubfoot with the Ponseti Method: Should We Begin Casting in the Newborn Period or Later?
    Iltar, Serkan
    Uysal, Mehmet
    Alemdaroglu, Kadir Bahadir
    Aydogan, Nevres Huerriyet
    Kara, Talip
    Atlihan, Dogan
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2010, 49 (05) : 426 - 431
  • [6] Comparison of the Ponseti method versus early tibialis anterior tendon transfer for idiopathic clubfoot: A prospective randomized study
    Gintautiene, Jolita
    Cekanauskas, Emilis
    Barauskas, Vidmantas
    Zalinkevicius, Rimantas
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2016, 52 (03): : 163 - 170
  • [7] Comparison of Ponseti and Kites method of treatment for idiopathic clubfoot
    Rijal, Raju
    Shrestha, Bikram Prasad
    Singh, Girish Kumar
    Singh, Mahipal
    Nepal, Pravin
    Khanal, Guru Prasad
    Rai, Pramila
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 44 (02) : 202 - 207
  • [8] Treatment of congenital clubfoot with the Ponseti method: the parents' perspective
    Nogueira, Monica P.
    Farcetta, Mariana
    Fox, Mark H.
    Miller, Kathleen K.
    Pereira, Tatiana S.
    Morcuende, Jose A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2013, 22 (06): : 583 - 588
  • [9] Midterm results of the Ponseti method in the treatment of congenital clubfoot
    Radler, Christof
    Mindler, Gabriel T.
    Riedl, Karin
    Lipkowski, Charlotte
    Kranzl, Andreas
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (09) : 1827 - 1831
  • [10] Persistent clubfoot deformity following treatment by the Ponseti method
    Chu, Alice
    Lehman, Wallace B.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2012, 21 (01): : 40 - 46