Research on energy efficiency evaluation based on indicators for industry sectors in China

被引：21

作者：

Song, Chenxi ^{[1
]}

Li, Mingjia ^{[1
]}

Wen, Zhexi ^{[1
]}

He, Ya-Ling ^{[1
]}

Tao, Wen-Quan ^{[1
]}

Li, Yangzhe ^{[2
]}

Wei, Xiangyang ^{[2
]}

Yin, Xiaolan ^{[2
]}

Huang, Xing ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Key Lab Thermofluid Sci & Engn MOE, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China

[2] Natl Energy Conservat Ctr, Natl Dev & Reform Commiss, Beijing 100045, Peoples R China

来源：

APPLIED ENERGY | 2014年 / 134卷

关键词：

Hierarchical-Indicator Comparison (HIC); method; Energy efficiency indicators system (EEI system); Plant-level; Purified terephthalic acid (PTA) industry; EMISSIONS; QUALITY;

D O I：

10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.049

中图分类号：

TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];

学科分类号：

0807 ; 0820 ;

摘要：

The so-called Hierarchical-Indicator Comparison (HIC) method is introduced in this paper. It mainly serves for industrial energy conservation programs in China. A chemical industry named purified terephthalic acid (PTA) is used to outline this method. Two key points of the HIC method are the construction of energy efficiency indicators (EEI) system and the way to utilize indicators appropriately. After a brief review of EE evaluation methods in literature, the construction procedure of energy efficiency indicators (EEI) system for PTA industry is presented firstly. How to correct reference values for indicators according to non-comparable factors is discussed. Then, how to implement the HIC method based on EEI system is presented. Every indicator has its own advantages and disadvantages. Disadvantages of an indicator can be conquered by other indicators. With multiple indicators used together, more objective EE evaluation result can be obtained. Finally, some proposals for further work of this method are also presented. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：550 / 562

页数：13

共 50 条

[41] Triggers and barriers to energy efficiency measures in the ceramic, cement and lime sectors
Venmans, Frank
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 69 : 133 - 142
[42] Untangling the drivers of energy reduction in the UK productive sectors: Efficiency or offshoring?
Hardt, Lukas
Owen, Anne
Brockway, Paul
Heun, Matthew K.
Barrett, John
Taylor, Peter G.
Foxon, Timothy J.
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 223 : 124 - 133
[43] The comprehensive environmental efficiency of socioeconomic sectors in China: An analysis based on a non-separable bad output SBM
He, Qi
Han, Ji
Guan, Dabo
Mi, Zhifu
Zhao, Hongyan
Zhang, Qiang
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 176 : 1091 - 1110
[44] Energy and Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of Transportation Systems in China's 255 Cities
Jiao, Liudan
Wu, Fengyan
Luo, Fenglian
Zhang, Yu
Huo, Xiaosen
FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
[45] Energy efficiency and productivity change of China's iron and steel industry: Accounting for undesirable outputs
He, Feng
Zhang, Qingzhi
Lei, Jiasu
Fu, Weihui
Xu, Xiaoning
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 54 : 204 - 213
[46] Changing trends of the elasticity of China's carbon emission intensity to industry structure and energy efficiency
Wang, Feng
Sun, Xiaoyu
Reiner, David M.
Wu, Min
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 86
[47] The eco-efficiency evaluation in China's cement industry: A city-level study
Wang, Yihan
Xu, Mao
Lv, Xiaojun
Wen, Zongguo
Chen, Chen
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 865
[48] Evaluation of carbon emission efficiency and spatial relevance in the thermal power industry: evidence from China
Liu, Yu
Guo, Rui-tang
Pan, Wei-guo
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (09) : 22715 - 22745
[49] Boosting Energy Efficiency and Solar Energy inside the Residential, Commercial, and Public Services Sectors in Mexico
Grande-Acosta, Genice K.
Islas-Samperio, Jorge M.
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (21)
[50] Forecast of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Energy Consumption in Industry Sectors in Thailand
Sutthichaimethee, Pruethsan
Ariyasajjakorn, Danupon
ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 22 (01) : 107 - 117

← 1 2 3 4 5 →