Assessing the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard of 2016: Can Americans Access Electronic Disclosure Information?

被引:1
作者
Berning, Craig F. [1 ]
Roe, Brian E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Agr Environm & Dev Econ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
genetically modified organisms (GMOs); food labels; biotechnology; United Stated Department of Agriculture; policy; information; consumer perception; legislation; GENETICALLY-MODIFIED FOOD; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; METAANALYSIS; ACCEPTANCE; LABELS;
D O I
10.3390/su9060916
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The debate as to whether to require mandatory labeling of genetically modified organism (GMO) foods was partially settled on 29 July 2016, when President Obama signed the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard into public law. In contrast to precipitating legislation passed by the State of Vermont that required disclosure of GMO ingredients on food shelves or food packages, the superseding National Standard allows firms to disclose bioengineered ingredients to consumers via symbols, electronic or digital links, or phone numbers, and further requires a study assessing the ability of consumers to access disclosure information by these means. This communication analyzes survey responses from 525 adults to investigate whether U.S. consumers are able to obtain information as per the disclosure methods allowed in the Federal legislation. The survey probes deeper to investigate consumer perceptions of genetically modified organisms and whether consumers would use the tools available to access disclosure about bioengineered ingredients. Findings from the survey show that 93.8% of respondents have the ability to access information via the disclosure methods permitted. Those in the lowest income group, and from the oldest age group are least likely to have such access. This provides the United State Department of Agriculture with information relevant to how they can implement the law and highlights particular demographic segments that may require additional attention to ensure the disclosed information is universally accessible.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GEN ENG CROPS EXP PR
[2]   Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison [J].
Ansolabehere, Stephen ;
Schaffner, Brian F. .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 22 (03) :285-303
[3]   Governing GMOs: The (Counter) Movement for Mandatory and Voluntary Non-GMO Labels [J].
Bain, Carmen ;
Dandachi, Tamera .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (12) :9456-9476
[4]   The dispersion and development of consumer preferences for genetically modified food - A meta-analysis [J].
Dannenberg, Astrid .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (8-9) :2182-2192
[5]   Firms' responses to nutritional policies [J].
Duvaleix-Treguer, S. ;
Hammoudi, A. ;
Rouached, L. ;
Soler, L. G. .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 39 (05) :843-877
[6]  
Farquhar D., GMO LABELING LIMELIG
[7]   Agrobiotechnology and competitiveness [J].
Kalaitzandonakes, NG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 82 (05) :1224-1233
[8]  
Klintman M., 2002, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, V4, P247, DOI DOI 10.1002/JEPP.113
[9]   Recasting "Substantial equivalence" - Transatlantic governance of GM food [J].
Levidow, Les ;
Murphy, Joseph ;
Carr, Susan .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2007, 32 (01) :26-64
[10]   Consumer Acceptance of New Food Technologies: Causes and Roots of Controversies [J].
Lusk, Jayson L. ;
Roosen, Jutta ;
Bieberstein, Andrea .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 6, 2014, 6 :381-405