A systematic literature review of the assessment of treatment burden experienced by patients and their caregivers

被引:51
作者
Sheehan, Orla C. [1 ,2 ]
Leff, Bruce [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ritchie, Christine S. [5 ,6 ]
Garrigues, Sarah K. [5 ]
Li, Lingsheng [2 ]
Saliba, Debra [7 ,8 ]
Fathi, Roya [9 ]
Boyd, Cynthia M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Aging & Hlth, Suite 2-700,2024 E Monument St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Geriatr Med & Gerontol, Ctr Transformat Geriatr Res, Mason F Lord Bldg,Ctr Tower,5200 Eastern Ave, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Nursing, Dept Community & Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Geriatr, 3333 Calif St,Suite 380, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, VA Qual Scholars Fellowship Program, 4150 Clement St,VA181G, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, JH Borun Ctr, 10945 Le Conte Ave,Suite 2339, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[8] Los Angeles VA GRECC, 10945 Le Conte Ave,Suite 2339, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[9] Kaiser Permanente San Rafael, Primary Care Home, Dept Adult & Family Med, 99 Montecillo Rd, San Rafael, CA 94903 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Treatment burden; Multiple chronic conditions; Systematic review; Patient; Caregiver; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CHRONIC ILLNESS; OLDER-ADULTS; COMPLEX PATIENTS; CARE; PEOPLE; DISEASE; QUESTIONNAIRE; PREFERENCES; DIFFICULTY;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-019-1222-z
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Many older adults with multiple chronic conditions, particularly those who are functionally impaired, spend considerable time juggling the competing demands of managing their conditions often assisted by caregivers. We examined methods of assessing the treatment burden experienced by this population as a first step to identifying strategies to reduce it. Methods Systematic searches were performed of the peer-reviewed and grey-literature (PubMed, Cochrane library, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, New York Academy of Medicine Grey Literature Review, NLM catalog and ProQuest Digital Theses and Dissertations). After title and abstract screening, both qualitative and quantitative articles describing approaches to assessment of treatment burden were included. Results Forty-five articles from the peer reviewed and three items from the grey literature were identified. Most articles (34/48) discussed treatment burden associated with a specific condition. All but one examined the treatment burden experienced by patients and six addressed the treatment burden experienced by caregivers. Qualitative studies revealed many aspects of treatment burden including the burdens of understanding the condition, juggling, monitoring and adjusting treatments, efforts to engage with others for support as well as financial and time burdens. Many tools to assess treatment burden in different populations were identified through the qualitative data. The most commonly used instrument was the Treatment Burden Questionnaire. Conclusions Many instruments are available to assess treatment burden, but no one standardized assessment method was identified. Few articles examined approaches to measuring the treatment burden experienced by caregivers. As people live longer with more chronic conditions healthcare providers need to identify patients and caregivers burdened by treatment and engage in approaches to ameliorate treatment burden. A standard and validated assessment method to measure treatment burden in the clinical setting would help to enhance the care of people with multiple chronic conditions, allow comparison of different approaches to reducing treatment burden, and foster ongoing evaluation and monitoring of burden across conditions, patient populations, and time.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Anderson G., 2004, Chronic Conditions: Making the Case for Ongoing Care
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], VALUING INVALUABLE 2
[4]  
[Anonymous], COMP EFFECTIVENESS P
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CAR US
[6]   Development of a conceptual model to illustrate the impact of multiple myeloma and its treatment on health-related quality of life [J].
Baz, R. ;
Lin, H. M. ;
Hui, A. -M. ;
Harvey, R. D. ;
Colson, K. ;
Gallop, K. ;
Swinburn, P. ;
Laubach, J. ;
Berg, D. ;
Richardson, P. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (09) :2789-2797
[7]   Quality of life and quality-adjusted survival (Q-TWiST) in patients receiving dose-intensive or standard dose chemotherapy for high-risk primary breast cancer [J].
Bernhard, J. ;
Zahrieh, D. ;
Zhang, J. J. ;
Martinelli, G. ;
Basser, R. ;
Huerny, C. ;
Forbes, J. F. ;
Aebi, S. ;
Yeo, W. ;
Thuerlimann, B. ;
Green, M. D. ;
Colleoni, M. ;
Gelber, R. D. ;
Castiglione-Gertsch, M. ;
Price, K. N. ;
Goldhirsch, A. ;
Coates, A. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 98 (01) :25-33
[8]   Patients' estimation of overall treatment burden:: Why not ask the obvious? [J].
Bernhard, J ;
Maibach, R ;
Thürlimann, B ;
Sessa, C ;
Aapro, MS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (01) :65-72
[9]   Time Needed for Treatment Is the Major Predictor of Quality of Life in Psoriasis [J].
Blome, Christine ;
Simianer, Stefan ;
Purwins, Sandra ;
Laass, Anna ;
Rustenbach, Stephan Jeff ;
Schaefer, Ines ;
Radtke, Marc ;
Augustin, Matthias .
DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 221 (02) :154-159
[10]   Meaningful conversations in living with and treating chronic conditions: development of the ICAN discussion aid [J].
Boehmer, Kasey R. ;
Hargraves, Ian G. ;
Allen, Summer V. ;
Matthews, Marc R. ;
Maher, Christina ;
Montori, Victor M. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 16