Writing in the STEM classroom: Faculty conceptions of writing and its role in the undergraduate classroom

被引:29
作者
Moon, Alena [1 ]
Gere, Anne Ruggles [2 ]
Shultz, Ginger V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Chem, 930 N Univ Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sweetland Ctr Writing, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
case study; faculty conceptions; phenomenography; science writing; undergraduate STEM; writing-to-learn; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; TO-LEARN; STUDENTS; SCIENTISTS; VIEWS; INSTRUCTION; DISCOURSE; ARGUMENT;
D O I
10.1002/sce.21454
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Writing is widely recognized as fundamental to the construction and communication of scientific knowledge. Building on this relationship between writing and knowledge construction, writing-to-learn (WTL) activities have shown to be effective in many science classrooms, but have not been widely implemented at the postsecondary level. To address the lack of implementation, we investigated potential adopters of this pedagogy. Potential adopters, postsecondary faculty, are unique given the key role writing plays in their professional practice as researchers. Because of this unique feature and the fact that an instructor's theoretical orientation toward a construct impacts their instruction of that construct, an investigation of postsecondary faculty's conceptions of writing instruction is necessary to understand the way writing is being used in the postsecondary classroom. To this end, 33 STEM faculty across multiple disciplines and positions were interviewed about writing and its role in their classes. A phenomenographic analysis resulted in four faculty types consisting of unique combinations of concept and practice, organized according to compatibility with WTL. Profiles were built that describe unique conceptions, desired outcomes, and challenges for each type. These profiles provide an understanding of the relationship between faculty's conceptions and instructional practices regarding writing and lay the groundwork for understanding how writing is used in the postsecondary classroom.
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1028
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Writing on Social Media: a Review of Research in the High School Classroom [J].
Galvin, Sarah ;
Greenhow, Christine .
TECHTRENDS, 2020, 64 (01) :57-69
[22]   Outcomes of Early Adopters Implementing the Flipped Classroom Approach in Undergraduate STEM Courses [J].
Idsardi, Robert ;
Friedly, Ivy ;
Mancinelli, Jennifer ;
Usai, Natasha ;
Matos, Luis F. .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 32 (05) :655-670
[23]   High school boys' and girls' writing conceptions and writing self-efficacy beliefs: what is their role in writing performance? [J].
Villalon, Ruth ;
Mateos, Mar ;
Cuevas, Isabel .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 35 (06) :653-674
[24]   Revealing Writing, Concealing Writers: High-Stakes Assessment in an Urban Elementary Classroom [J].
Dutro, Elizabeth ;
Selland, Makenzie K. ;
Bien, Andrea C. .
JOURNAL OF LITERACY RESEARCH, 2013, 45 (02) :99-141
[25]   Teaching Writing to Students With Learning Disabilities: An Observational Study of Classroom Practices [J].
Ciullo, Stephen ;
Collins, Alyson A. ;
Graham, Steve ;
Kosaraju, Sagarika ;
Lee, Joong won .
LEARNING DISABILITIES RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2025,
[26]   Association Between Young Chinese Children's Early Writing Skills and the Chinese Preschool Classroom Writing Environment [J].
Zhang, Chenyi ;
Zhang, Xiao ;
Bingham, Gary E. ;
Zhang, Liying .
EARLY EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 36 (01) :102-128
[28]   Data-driven learning in the academic writing classroom: Citation and stance [J].
Quintana Toledo, Elena .
LFE-REVISTA DE LENGUAS PARA FINES ESPECIFICOS, 2020, 26 (01) :196-213
[29]   Using a genre-based writing method in the distance education classroom [J].
Ozdemir, Osman .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2023, 12 (02) :72-93
[30]   An Investigation into Using Flipped Classroom Model in an Academic Writing Class in Vietnam [J].
Nhat Quang Nguyen ;
Lee, Kean Wah ;
Dung Ngoc Phuong Nguyen ;
Naidu, Sivabala .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING, 2019, 9 (01) :32-57