Reliability assessment and approaches to determining agreement between measurements: Classic methods paper

被引:16
作者
Griffiths, Peter [1 ]
Murrells, Trevor [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Natl Nursing Res Unit, London SE1 8WA, England
关键词
Reliability; Test-retest reliability; Inter-rater reliability; Measurement; Reproducibility of results; Validation studies; Observer variation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.03.004
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
This classic methods paper (Bland and Altman, 2010) considers the assessment of agreement between measures, an often overlooked aspect of assessing measurements taken for use in research and practice and (re) introduces the ubiquitous 'Bland Altman' procedures for assessing agreement. The importance of these procedures is high and they address issues that are not always considered in research which uses measurement scales or describes the characteristics of scales developed for use in clinical practice. Many widely used approaches for reliability assessment can fail to consider the agreement between measures at all and can give an entirely misleading impression of an instrument's suitability for use in research or practice. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 938
页数:2
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
    Bland, J. Martin
    Altman, Douglas G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2010, 47 (08) : 931 - 936
  • [2] Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale: A systematic review
    Kottner, Jan
    Dassen, Theo
    Tannen, Antje
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2009, 46 (03) : 369 - 379
  • [3] Interrater reliability and the kappa statistic: A comment on Morris et al. (2008)
    Kottner, Jan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2009, 46 (01) : 141 - 142
  • [4] Polit D.F., 2007, NURSING RES GENERATI, V8th