Comparison of Frontomaxillary Facial Angles Using Both 2D and 3D Ultrasound at 11+0 to 13+6 Weeks of Gestation

被引:7
作者
Alphonse, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
Cox, Jennifer [2 ]
Clarke, Jill [2 ]
Schluter, Philip J. [3 ,4 ]
McLennan, Andrew [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Sydney Ultrasound Women, Bella Vista, NSW 2153, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
[3] AUT Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Psychosocial Studies, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Herston, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
关键词
Facial angles; frontomaxillary; Ultrasound; 2D; 3D; Nuchal translucency; FETAL NUCHAL-TRANSLUCENCY; TRICUSPID REGURGITATION; TURNER SYNDROME; 1ST TRIMESTER; TRISOMIES; 21; NASAL BONE; TRISOMY-21; FETUSES; MULTICENTER; 13+6-WEEK;
D O I
10.1159/000313638
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim of this study is to (i) directly compare both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) frontomaxillary facial angle (FMFA) in first trimester, and (ii) to assess the ease with which both may be performed. Materials and Methods: Both 3D volumes of the fetal head and 2D fetal profiles were collected from 251 consenting patients during routine first-trimester nuchal translucency (NT) screening. The FMFA in 2D was measured at the time of the NT screening. The 3D FMFA was measured offline. Results: The 2D FMFA was systematically higher than the 3D FMFA. The difference in 3D-2D FMFA was statistically significant from 11+0 to 12+3 weeks. From 12+4 to 13+6 weeks the difference was no longer significant with p = 0.06. Performing the measurement did not unduly increase the time of the study. Even for the experienced sonographer the technique is technically difficult, relying on many factors for accurate caliper placement. Discussion: The 2D FMFA is greater than the 3D angle. This was found in previous studies, but not thought to be statistically significant. The difference decreased with increasing gestational age. There is a learning curve associated with performing this measurement. Normative data for both 2D and 3D, incorporating ethnicity, may be necessary before inclusion in the first-trimester algorithm. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 21
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   Ultrasound grayscale image quality comparison between a 2D intracavitary transducer and a 3D intracavitary transducer used in 2D mode: A phantom study [J].
Zhou, Wei ;
Long, Zaiyang ;
Tradup, Donald J. ;
Stekel, Scott F. ;
Browne, Jacinth E. ;
Brown, Douglas L. ;
Hangiandreou, Nicholas J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (06) :134-140
[22]   3D ULTRASOUND GENERATION FROM PARTIAL 2D OBSERVATIONS USING FULLY CONVOLUTIONAL AND SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION NETWORKS [J].
Mezheritsky, Tal ;
Romaguera, Liset Vazquez ;
Kadoury, Samuel .
2020 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI 2020), 2020, :1808-1811
[23]   Segmentation of Intraoperative 3D Ultrasound Images Using a Pyramidal Blur-Pooled 2D U-Net [J].
Sharifzadeh, Mostafa ;
Benali, Habib ;
Rivaz, Hassan .
LESION SEGMENTATION IN SURGICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC APPLICATIONS, MICCAI 2022, CURIOUS 2022, KIPA 2022, MELA 2022, 2023, 13648 :69-75
[24]   Prostate boundary segmentation from ultrasound images using 2D active shape models: Optimisation and extension to 3D [J].
Hodge, Adam C. ;
Fenster, Aaron ;
Downey, Donal B. ;
Ladak, Hanif M. .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2006, 84 (2-3) :99-113
[25]   A Phantom Study Comparing Ultrasound-Guided Liver Tumor Puncture Using New Real-Time 3D Ultrasound and Conventional 2D Ultrasound [J].
Sugimoto, Katsutoshi ;
Moriyasu, Fuminori ;
Shiraishi, Junji ;
Yamada, Masahiko ;
Imai, Yasuharu .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (06) :W753-W757
[26]   2D versus 3D real time ultrasound with live xPlane imaging to visualize aortic and ductal arches: comparison between methods [J].
Dell'Oro, Stefania ;
Verderio, Maria ;
Incerti, Maddalena ;
Mastrolia, Salvatore Andrea ;
Cozzolino, Sabrina ;
Vergani, Patrizia .
PEERJ, 2018, 6
[27]   Description of a novel technique for ultrasound-based planning for gynaecological 3D brachytherapy and comparison between plans of this technique and 2D with fluoroscopy [J].
Salas, Juan Carlos Pari ;
Veliz, Danny Giancarlo Apaza .
ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2022, 16
[28]   Towards automated extraction of 2D standard fetal head planes from 3D ultrasound acquisitions: A clinical evaluation and quality assessment comparison [J].
Skelton, E. ;
Matthew, J. ;
Li, Y. ;
Khanal, B. ;
Martinez, J. J. Cerrolaza ;
Toussaint, N. ;
Gupta, C. ;
Knight, C. ;
Kainz, B. ;
Hajnal, J. V. ;
Rutherford, M. .
RADIOGRAPHY, 2021, 27 (02) :519-526
[29]   Comparison between a novel 2D–3D ultrasound system (Accuro®) and conventional two-dimensional ultrasound for assessment of the lumbar spine: a prospective cohort study in volunteers [J].
Juliana Caicedo ;
Mrinalini Balki ;
Cristian Arzola ;
Naveed Siddiqui ;
Xiang Y. Ye ;
Kristy Downey ;
Jose C. A. Carvalho .
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2021, 68 :1711-1712
[30]   Quaternion Based Freehand 3D Baby Phantom Reconstruction Using 2D Ultrasound Probe and Game Controller Motion and Positioning Sensors [J].
Mohamed, F. ;
Mong, W. S. ;
Yusoff, Y. A. .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR INNOVATION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND LIFE SCIENCES, ICIBEL2015, 2016, 56 :272-278