Causes of ventricular oversensing in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Implications for diagnosis of lead fracture

被引:23
作者
Gunderson, Bruce D. [3 ]
Swerdlow, Charles D. [2 ]
Wilcox, Jay M. [3 ]
Hayman, Jean E. [3 ]
Ousdigian, Kevin T. [3 ]
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Med Coll Virginia, Div Cardiol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[3] Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Defibrillator lead; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Oversensing; Sensing integrity counter; SURGICAL REVISION; FAILURE; COMPLICATIONS; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.01.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) ventricular oversensing may result in inappropriate therapy, which may be triggered by lead/connection issues that require surgical revision or physiologic oversensing that may be resolved with reprogramming. The sensing integrity counter (SIC) is an oversensing diagnostic that increments for very rapid ventricular intervals <= 130 ms. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the causes of a high SIC and the ability of additional diagnostics to differentiate lead/connection issues from other causes of oversensing for patients with normal impedance. METHODS Frequent SICs were identified in patients during routine follow-up visits. To diagnose the cause of oversensing, patients wore a modified 24-hour digital Holter monitor that recorded ECG, ventricular electrogram, and the ICD Marker Channel (Medtronic). Recordings were reviewed to determine the causes of oversensing. Patients with confirmed oversensing and adequate data were analyzed. The number of SICs per day and the presence of a nonsustained tachycardia (NST) episode with ventricular mean cycle length <220 ms were retrieved from stored ICD data. RESULTS Forty-eight patients had a median of 13 SICs/day. Presumed lead/connection issues occurred in 23% of patients, whereas physiologic oversensing occurred in 77% of patients. A rapid NST was recorded more commonly in patients with lead/connection issues than in those without (9/11 vs 1/37; P<.0001). CONCLUSION Oversensing resulting in frequent, very short intervals typically are caused by either lead/connection issues or physiologic signals. The additional finding of rapid NSTs usually indicates a lead/connection issue, even in the absence of impedance abnormalities.
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 633
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure
    Bardy, GH
    Lee, KL
    Mark, DB
    Poole, JE
    Packer, DL
    Boineau, R
    Domanski, M
    Troutman, C
    Anderson, J
    Johnson, G
    McNulty, SE
    Clapp-Channing, N
    Davidson-Ray, LD
    Fraulo, ES
    Fishbein, DP
    Luceri, RM
    Ip, JH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (03) : 225 - 237
  • [2] Analysis of Pacing/Defibrillator Lead Failure Using Device Diagnostics and Pacing Maneuvers
    Chung, Eugene H.
    Casavant, David
    John, Roy M.
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 32 (04): : 547 - 549
  • [3] Sensing lead failure in implantable defibrillators: A comparison of two commonly used leads
    Degeratu, FT
    Khalighi, K
    Peters, RW
    Shorofsky, SR
    Gold, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (01) : 21 - 24
  • [4] Multiple ICD Discharges Associated with Lead Fracture Without Triggering of High Impedance Alert
    Donaldson, David M.
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Heist, E. Kevin
    Mela, Theofanie
    Ruskin, Jeremy N.
    Das, Saumya
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 32 (04): : 543 - 546
  • [5] Transvenous defibrillation leads: High incidence of failure during long-term follow-up
    Dorwarth, U
    Frey, B
    Dugas, M
    Matis, T
    Fiek, M
    Schmoeckel, M
    Remp, T
    Durchlaub, I
    Gerth, A
    Steinbeck, G
    Hoffmann, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (01) : 38 - 43
  • [6] Complications leading to surgical revision in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: comparison of patients with single-chamber, dual-chamber, and biventricular devices
    Duray, Gabor Z.
    Schmitt, Joern
    Cicek-Hartvig, Sule
    Hohnloser, Stefan H.
    Israel, Carsten W.
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2009, 11 (03): : 297 - 302
  • [7] Necessity for surgical revision of defibrillator leads implanted long-term causes and management
    Eckstein, Jens
    Koller, Michael T.
    Zabel, Markus
    Kalusche, Dietrich
    Schaer, Beat A.
    Osswald, Stefan
    Sticherling, Christian
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2008, 117 (21) : 2727 - 2733
  • [8] Detection and management of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead failure - Incidence and clinical implications
    Ellenbogen, KA
    Wood, MA
    Shepard, RK
    Clemo, HF
    Vaughn, T
    Holloman, K
    Dow, M
    Leffler, J
    Abeyratne, A
    Verness, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (01) : 73 - 80
  • [9] Accelerating risk of Fidelis lead fracture
    Farwell, David
    Green, Martin S.
    Lemery, Robert
    Gollob, Michael H.
    Birnie, David H.
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2008, 5 (10) : 1375 - 1379
  • [10] Groves R., 2007, URGENT MED DEVICE IN