Psychological support for patients with cancer: evidence review and suggestions for future directions

被引:64
作者
Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Beatty, Lisa [2 ]
Dhillon, Haryana M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chester, Dept Psychol, Chester Res Unit Psychol Hlth, Parkgate Rd, Chester CH1 4BJ, Cheshire, England
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Flinders Ctr Innovat Canc, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Ctr Med Psychol & Evidence Based Decis Making, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
cancer; cognitive behavioural therapy; psychological distress; psychological intervention; third-wave therapies; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EXPRESSIVE GROUP-THERAPY; PALLIATIVE CARE PATIENTS; SELF-HELP INTERVENTION; BREAST-CANCER; PROSTATE-CANCER; DIGNITY THERAPY; COMMITMENT THERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/SPC.0000000000000360
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of review Psychological distress and mental health comorbidity are common in cancer. Various therapeutic frameworks have been used for interventions to improve psychological wellbeing and quality of life in cancer patients with mixed results. This article reviews contributions to that literature published since January 2017. Recent findings The majority of new psychological intervention research in cancer has used cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or mindfulness-based interventions. CBT has been considered a gold-standard intervention and recent evidence justifies continuation of this. Recent reviews call into question the validity of evidence for mindfulness-based interventions. A smaller number of trials using acceptance and commitment therapy, meta-cognitive therapy, dignity therapy and coaching have emerged, and whereas findings are promising, additional fully powered trials are required. Weaker evidence exists for counselling, support-based and narrative therapy interventions. Summary Efficacious, timely and acceptable psychological interventions are a necessary component of comprehensive cancer care. There is some way to go before the evidence conclusively points towards which interventions work for which cancer groups and for which specific outcomes. Methodological limitations must be addressed in future trials; at the forefront remains the need for fully powered, head-to-head comparison trials.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 292
页数:17
相关论文
共 132 条
[1]   The relevance of experiential avoidance in breast cancer distress: insights from a psychological group intervention [J].
Aguirre-Camacho, Aldo ;
Pelletier, Guy ;
Gonzalez-Marquez, Ana ;
Blanco-Donoso, Luis M. ;
Garcia-Borreguero, Paula ;
Moreno-Jimenez, Bernardo .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 26 (04) :469-475
[2]   Internet-delivered cognitive-behaviour therapy for recent cancer survivors: a feasibility trial [J].
Alberts, Nicole M. ;
Hadjistavropoulos, Heather D. ;
Dear, Blake F. ;
Titov, Nickolai .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 26 (01) :137-139
[3]   Guided internet-administered self-help to reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression among adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer during adolescence (U-CARE: YoungCan): a study protocol for a feasibility trial [J].
Ander, Malin ;
Wikman, Anna ;
Ljotsson, Brjann ;
Groenqvist, Helena ;
Ljungman, Gustaf ;
Woodford, Joanne ;
Norberg, Annika Lindahl ;
von Essen, Louise .
BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (01)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, HDB COACHING PSYCHOL
[5]  
[Anonymous], PRELIMINARY OPEN TRI
[6]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOONCOLOGY
[7]  
[Anonymous], WORR SICK EM IMP CAN
[8]  
[Anonymous], ASIAN PAC J CANC PRE
[9]  
[Anonymous], MORE MIRACLES STATE
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2006, SCHEMA THERAPY PRACT