The area under the ROC curve as a measure of clustering quality

被引:19
作者
Jaskowiak, Pablo A. [1 ]
Costa, Ivan G. [2 ]
Campello, Ricardo J. G. B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Santa Catarina UFSC, Joinville, SC, Brazil
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Computat Genom, Med Fac, Aachen, Germany
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Math & Phys Sci, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Clustering validation; Area under the curve; Receiver operating characteristics; AUC/ROC; Area under the curve for clustering; Qualitative/visual clustering evaluation; R-PACKAGE; VALIDATION; INDEXES; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1007/s10618-022-00829-0
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) Curve, referred to as AUC, is a well-known performance measure in the supervised learning domain. Due to its compelling features, it has been employed in a number of studies to evaluate and compare the performance of different classifiers. In this work, we explore AUC as a performance measure in the unsupervised learning domain, more specifically, in the context of cluster analysis. In particular, we elaborate on the use of AUC as an internal/relative measure of clustering quality, which we refer to as Area Under the Curve for Clustering (AUCC). We show that the AUCC of a given candidate clustering solution has an expected value under a null model of random clustering solutions, regardless of the size of the dataset and, more importantly, regardless of the number or the (im)balance of clusters under evaluation. In addition, we elaborate on the fact that, in the context of internal/relative clustering validation as we consider, AUCC is actually a linear transformation of the Gamma criterion from Baker and Hubert (1975), for which we also formally derive a theoretical expected value for chance clusterings. We also discuss the computational complexity of these criteria and show that, while an ordinary implementation of Gamma can be computationally prohibitive and impractical for most real applications of cluster analysis, its equivalence with AUCC actually unveils a much more efficient algorithmic procedure. Our theoretical findings are supported by experimental results. These results show that, in addition to an effective and robust quantitative evaluation provided by AUCC, visual inspection of the ROC curves themselves can be useful to further assess a candidate clustering solution from a broader, qualitative perspective as well.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / 1245
页数:27
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] A comparison of extrinsic clustering evaluation metrics based on formal constraints
    Amigo, Enrique
    Gonzalo, Julio
    Artiles, Javier
    Verdejo, Felisa
    [J]. INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 2009, 12 (04): : 461 - 486
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, Clustering
  • [3] An extensive comparative study of cluster validity indices
    Arbelaitz, Olatz
    Gurrutxaga, Ibai
    Muguerza, Javier
    Perez, Jesus M.
    Perona, Inigo
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2013, 46 (01) : 243 - 256
  • [4] MEASURING POWER OF HIERARCHICAL CLUSTER-ANALYSIS
    BAKER, FB
    HUBERT, LJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1975, 70 (349) : 31 - 38
  • [5] Some new indexes of cluster validity
    Bezdek, JC
    Pal, NR
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 1998, 28 (03): : 301 - 315
  • [6] The use of the area under the roc curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms
    Bradley, AP
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1997, 30 (07) : 1145 - 1159
  • [7] clValid: An R package for cluster validation
    Brock, Guy
    Datta, Susmita
    Pihur, Vasyl
    Datta, Somnath
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2008, 25 (04): : 1 - 22
  • [8] Calinski T., 1974, COMMUN STAT-THEOR M, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/03610927408827101
  • [9] The origins of the Gini index: extracts from VariabilitA e MutabilitA (1912) by Corrado Gini
    Ceriani, Lidia
    Verme, Paolo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, 2012, 10 (03) : 421 - 443
  • [10] Charrad M, 2014, J STAT SOFTW, V61, P1