Policy options for non-grain bioethanol in China: Insights from an economy-energy-environment CGE model

被引:35
作者
Ge, Jianping [1 ,2 ]
Lei, Yalin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Humanities & Econ Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Land & Resources, Key Lab Carrying Capac Assessment Resource & Envi, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Incentive policy; Computable general equilibrium (CGE); Bioethanol; Carbon dioxide emission; China; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM-ANALYSIS; FUEL ETHANOL; LIQUID BIOFUELS; FOOD SECURITY; BIOENERGY; EMISSIONS; IMPACTS; CORN;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Chinese government has been issuing numerous incentive policies to promote non-grain bioethanol development to address the problem of excessive energy consumption and environmental pollution. In this study, we divide the incentive policies into five categories: subsidies on bioethanol production, non-grain feedstocks planting, marginal land reclamation and utilization, bioethanol consumption in more cities, and consumption tax on gasoline use. The objective of the paper is to evaluate and compare the economic, energy, and environmental effects of the incentive policies to help the government choose the optimal policies to promote bioethanol in China. The results show that subsidies on bioethanol production and consumption can boost GDP, and simultaneously, decrease crude oil and gasoline consumption, and reduce CO2 emissions. However, the increase in bioethanol consumption is combined with the rise in coal and electricity consumption. Subsidies on bioethanol production can promote GDP and reduce energy consumption and CO2 emission but have less effect on bioethanol development than that under the scenario of subsides on bioethanol consumption. On the contrary, although subsidies on non-grain feedstocks planting and marginal land reclamation and utilization can improve macro-economy but have a negative effect on energy saving and CO2 emission reduction. Therefore, appropriate subsidies on bioethanol production and consumption can promote bioethanol consumption with economic, energy and environmental benefits. The Chinese government should further pay more attention to the coordination of different policy options by policy tools and intensities.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 511
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 4341 WORLD BANK
[2]  
[Anonymous], CH15030 USDA GAIN FO
[3]   Biofuels and economic development: A computable general equilibrium analysis for Tanzania [J].
Arndt, Channing ;
Pauw, Karl ;
Thurlow, James .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (06) :1922-1930
[4]  
Birur D. K., 2008, 53 GTAP PURD U DEP A, P1
[5]   Environmental life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic conversion to ethanol: A review [J].
Borrion, Aiduan Li ;
McManus, Marcelle C. ;
Hammond, Geoffrey P. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (07) :4638-4650
[6]   Biofuels development in China: Technology options and policies needed to meet the 2020 target [J].
Chang, Shiyan ;
Zhao, Lili ;
Timilsina, Govinda R. ;
Zhang, Xiliang .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 51 :64-79
[7]   Potential production of non-food biofuels in China [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Wu, Fangwei ;
Zhang, Jinhua .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 85 :939-944
[8]   ENERGY-BALANCE FOR ETHYL-ALCOHOL PRODUCTION FROM CROPS [J].
DASILVA, JG ;
SERRA, GE ;
MOREIRA, JR ;
CONCALVES, JC ;
GOLDEMBERG, J .
SCIENCE, 1978, 201 (4359) :903-906
[9]   Non-grain fuel ethanol expansion and its effects on food security: A computable general equilibrium analysis for China [J].
Ge, Jianping ;
Lei, Yalin ;
Tokunaga, Suminori .
ENERGY, 2014, 65 :346-356
[10]   Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Selected US Ethanol Production and Use Pathways in 2022 [J].
Hsu, David D. ;
Inman, Daniel ;
Heath, Garvin A. ;
Wolfrum, Edward J. ;
Mann, Margaret K. ;
Aden, Andy .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (13) :5289-5297