Cost-effectiveness of orthodontics: a systematic review

被引:4
作者
Jermyn, Owen [1 ]
Bister, Dirk [1 ]
Jin, Huajie [2 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Orthodont, Dent Inst, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Kings Hlth Econ, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, London, England
关键词
MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS; MALOCCLUSION; MULTICENTER; UTILITY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/ejo/cjac019
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Health economic evaluation is a methodology to maximize health benefits and minimize opportunity costs and is of increasing importance in informing resource allocation decisions in healthcare. Objective: This systematic review aims to assess the availability and quality of economic evaluations of any orthodontic interventions and summarize the conclusions of these studies. Search methods: A thorough search of the literature was carried out including terms related to orthodontic interventions and economic evaluation between January 2000 and February 2022. MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, and Cochrane were searched. Grey literature was searched and further hand-searching was performed on the reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. Selection criteria: Studies on cleft lip and palate surgery and sleep apnoea were excluded due to the multi-disciplinary nature of these conditions which might alter the applicability of the result to orthodontic interventions. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion. Data collection and analysis: Data extraction was carried out through full text analysis of included studies by two authors. The quality of each study was assessed according to the Drummond 10-point Checklist and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Quality Appraisal Checklist for Economic Evaluations. Characteristics and conclusions of included articles were descriptively summarized. Results: Sixteen articles met inclusion criteria. Most of the included articles were trial-based studies, with only one model-based study. Orthodontic interventions assessed included crossbite correction, functional appliance treatment and orthognathic surgery. Most studies were carried out in Europe and specifically in Sweden. The quality of included studies was generally low with 69% of studies reported as having serious limitations according to the NICE Checklist. Conclusion: This review highlighted a lack of economic evaluations for orthodontic interventions, and limitations of existing economic evaluations. Recommendations on future research are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 577
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS: UTILITY OR FUTILITY? [J].
Anderson, Rob .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2010, 19 (03) :350-364
[2]   Open and closed surgical exposure of palatally displaced canines: a cost- minimization analysis of a multicentre, randomized controlled trial [J].
Bjorksved, Margitha ;
Ryen, Linda ;
Lindsten, Rune ;
Bazargani, Farhan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2021, 43 (05) :498-505
[3]  
Borrie FRP, 2013, J ORTHOD, V40, P145, DOI 10.1179/1465313312Y.0000000028
[4]   Modelling in health economic evaluation - What is its place? What is its value? [J].
Brennan, A ;
Akehurst, R .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2000, 17 (05) :445-459
[5]   The death of cost-minimization analysis? [J].
Briggs, AH ;
O'Brien, BJ .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2001, 10 (02) :179-184
[6]   Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: Choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease [J].
Briggs, AH ;
Goeree, R ;
Blackhouse, G ;
O'Brien, BJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2002, 22 (04) :290-308
[7]  
Buxton MJ, 1997, HEALTH ECON, V6, P217, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199705)6:3<217::AID-HEC267>3.3.CO
[8]  
2-N
[9]   Economic note - Cost of illness studies [J].
Byford, S ;
Torgerson, DJ ;
Raftery, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7245) :1335-1335
[10]   Modeling Good Research Practices-Overview: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1 [J].
Caro, J. Jaime ;
Briggs, Andrew H. ;
Siebert, Uwe ;
Kuntz, Karen M. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 32 (05) :667-677