Effect of gabapentin on hyperemesis gravidarum: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

被引:7
作者
Guttuso, Thomas, Jr. [1 ]
Messing, Susan [2 ]
Tu, Xin [4 ]
Mullin, Patrick [5 ]
Shepherd, Rachel [1 ]
Strittmatter, Chad [6 ]
Saha, Sumona [7 ]
Thornburg, Loralei L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Jacobs Sch Med & Biomed Sci, Dept Neurol, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Dept Biostat & Computat Biol, Rochester, NY USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, NY USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Family Med & Publ Hlth, Div Biostat & Bioinformat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Sisters Charity Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Buffalo, NY USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
关键词
clinical trial; maternal-fetal medicine; metoclopramide; nausea; nutrition; obstetrics; ondansetron; pregnancy; vomiting; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA; HOT FLASHES; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; CORTICOSTEROIDS; METOCLOPRAMIDE; ONDANSETRON; OUTCOMES; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100273
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Hyperemesis gravidarum is a disabling disease of nausea, vomiting, and undernutrition in early pregnancy for which there are no effective outpatient therapies. Poor weight gain in hyperemesis gravidarum is associated with several adverse fetal outcomes including preterm delivery, low birthweight, small for gestational age, low 5-minute Apgar scores, and neurodevelopmental delay. Gabapentin is most commonly used clinically for treating neuropathic pain but also substantially reduces chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Pregnancy registry data have shown maternal first-trimester gabapentin monotherapy to be associated with a 1.2% rate of major congenital malformations among 659 infants, which compares favorably with the 1.6% to 2.2% major congenital malformation rate in the general population. Open-label gabapentin treatment in hyperemesis gravidarum was associated with reduced nausea and vomiting and improved oral nutrition. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether gabapentin is more effective than standard-of-care therapy for treating hyperemesis gravidarum. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial was conducted among patients with medically refractory hyperemesis gravidarum requiring intravenous hydration. Patients were randomized (1:1) to either oral gabapentin (1800-2400 mg/d) or an active comparator of either oral ondansetron (24-32 mg/d) or oral metoclopramide (45-60 mg/d) for 7 days. Differences in Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis total scores between treatment groups averaged over days 5 to 7, using intention-to-treat principle employing a linear mixed-effects model adjusted for baseline Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis scores, which served as the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis nausea and vomit and retch subscores, oral nutrition, global satisfaction of treatment, relief, desire to continue therapy, Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy Quality of Life, and Hyperemesis Gravidarum Pregnancy Termination Consideration. Adjustments for multiple comparisons were made employing the false discovery rate. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients with hyperemesis gravidarum were enrolled from October 2014 to May 2019. Among the 21 patients providing primary outcome data (12 assigned to gabapentin and 9 to the active comparator arm), 18 were enrolled as outpatients and all 21 were outpatients from days 5 to 7. The study groups' baseline characteristics were well matched. Gabapentin treatment provided a 52% greater reduction in days 5 to 7 baseline adjusted Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis total scores than treatment with active comparator (95% confidence interval, 16-88; P=.01). Most secondary outcomes also favored gabapentin over active comparator treatment including 46% and 49% decreases in baseline adjusted Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis nausea (95% confidence interval, 19-72; P=.005) and vomit and retch subscores (95% confidence interval, 21-77; P=.005), respectively; a 96% increase in baseline adjusted oral nutrition scores (95% confidence interval, 27-165; P=.01); and a 254% difference in global satisfaction of treatment (95% confidence interval, 48-459; P=.03). Relief (P=.06) and desire to continue therapy (P=.06) both showed trends favoring gabapentin treatment but Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy Quality of Life (P=.68) and Hyperemesis Gravidarum Pregnancy Termination Consideration (P=.58) did not. Adverse events were roughly equivalent between the groups. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this small trial, gabapentin was more effective than standard-of-care therapy for reducing nausea and vomiting and increasing oral nutrition and global satisfaction in outpatients with hyperemesis gravidarum. These data build on previous findings in other patient populations supporting gabapentin as a novel antinausea and antiemetic therapy and support further research on gabapentin for this challenging complication of pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Prenatal Micronutrient Supplementation on Spontaneous Preterm Birth: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial in China
    Li, Zhiwen
    Mei, Zuguo
    Zhang, Le
    Li, Hongtian
    Zhang, Yali
    Li, Nan
    Ye, Rongwei
    Ren, Aiguo
    Liu, Jian-Meng
    Serdula, Mary K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 186 (03) : 318 - 325
  • [42] A randomized double-blind controlled trial of the use of dydrogesterone in women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Chan, Diana Man Ka
    Cheung, Ka Wang
    Yung, Sofie Shuk Fei
    Lee, Vivian Chi Yan
    Li, Raymond Hang Wun
    Ng, Ernest Hung Yu
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [43] Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of transdermal nitroglycerin for preterm labor
    Smith, Graeme N.
    Walker, Mark C.
    Ohlsson, Arne
    O'Brien, Karel
    Windrim, Rory
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 196 (01) : 37 - 39
  • [44] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pseudoephedrine in coryza
    Latte, J
    Taverner, D
    Slobodian, P
    Shakib, S
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 31 (07): : 429 - 432
  • [45] Treatment of depression with onabotulinumtoxinA: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial
    Finzi, Eric
    Rosenthal, Norman E.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2014, 52 : 1 - 6
  • [46] Double-blind randomized controlled trial of rolls fortified with microencapsulated iron
    Navarro Barbosa, Teresa Negreira
    de Aguiar Carrazedo Taddei, Jose Augusto
    Palma, Domingos
    Ancona-Lopez, Fabio
    Pellegrini Braga, Josefina Aparecida
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2012, 58 (01): : 118 - 124
  • [47] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy
    Kapur, B
    Hackman, R
    Selby, P
    Klein, J
    Koren, G
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2001, 62 (04): : 274 - 278
  • [48] Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Metoclopramide for Hypersalivation Associated With Clozapine
    Kreinin, Anatoly
    Miodownik, Chanoch
    Mirkin, Vitaly
    Gaiduk, Yulia
    Yankovsky, Yan
    Bersudsky, Yuly
    Lerner, Paul P.
    Bergman, Joseph
    Lerner, Vladimir
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 36 (03) : 200 - 205
  • [49] Metformin for overweight women at midlife: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Worsley, R.
    Jane, F.
    Robinson, P. J.
    Bell, R. J.
    Davis, S. R.
    CLIMACTERIC, 2015, 18 (02) : 270 - 277
  • [50] Effect of Denosumab or Alendronic Acid on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Pawade, Tania A.
    Doris, Mhairi K.
    Bing, Rong
    White, Audrey C.
    Forsyth, Laura
    Evans, Emily
    Graham, Catriona
    Williams, Michelle C.
    van Beek, Edwin J. R.
    Fletcher, Alison
    Adamson, Philip D.
    Andrews, Jack P. M.
    Cartlidge, Timothy R. G.
    Jenkins, William S. A.
    Syed, Maaz
    Fujisawa, Takeshi
    Lucatelli, Christophe
    Fraser, William
    Ralston, Stuart H.
    Boon, Nicholas
    Prendergast, Bernard
    Newby, David E.
    Dweck, Marc R.
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 143 (25) : 2418 - 2427