Effect of gabapentin on hyperemesis gravidarum: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

被引:7
|
作者
Guttuso, Thomas, Jr. [1 ]
Messing, Susan [2 ]
Tu, Xin [4 ]
Mullin, Patrick [5 ]
Shepherd, Rachel [1 ]
Strittmatter, Chad [6 ]
Saha, Sumona [7 ]
Thornburg, Loralei L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Jacobs Sch Med & Biomed Sci, Dept Neurol, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Dept Biostat & Computat Biol, Rochester, NY USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, NY USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Family Med & Publ Hlth, Div Biostat & Bioinformat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Sisters Charity Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Buffalo, NY USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
关键词
clinical trial; maternal-fetal medicine; metoclopramide; nausea; nutrition; obstetrics; ondansetron; pregnancy; vomiting; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA; HOT FLASHES; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; CORTICOSTEROIDS; METOCLOPRAMIDE; ONDANSETRON; OUTCOMES; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100273
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Hyperemesis gravidarum is a disabling disease of nausea, vomiting, and undernutrition in early pregnancy for which there are no effective outpatient therapies. Poor weight gain in hyperemesis gravidarum is associated with several adverse fetal outcomes including preterm delivery, low birthweight, small for gestational age, low 5-minute Apgar scores, and neurodevelopmental delay. Gabapentin is most commonly used clinically for treating neuropathic pain but also substantially reduces chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Pregnancy registry data have shown maternal first-trimester gabapentin monotherapy to be associated with a 1.2% rate of major congenital malformations among 659 infants, which compares favorably with the 1.6% to 2.2% major congenital malformation rate in the general population. Open-label gabapentin treatment in hyperemesis gravidarum was associated with reduced nausea and vomiting and improved oral nutrition. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether gabapentin is more effective than standard-of-care therapy for treating hyperemesis gravidarum. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial was conducted among patients with medically refractory hyperemesis gravidarum requiring intravenous hydration. Patients were randomized (1:1) to either oral gabapentin (1800-2400 mg/d) or an active comparator of either oral ondansetron (24-32 mg/d) or oral metoclopramide (45-60 mg/d) for 7 days. Differences in Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis total scores between treatment groups averaged over days 5 to 7, using intention-to-treat principle employing a linear mixed-effects model adjusted for baseline Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis scores, which served as the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis nausea and vomit and retch subscores, oral nutrition, global satisfaction of treatment, relief, desire to continue therapy, Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy Quality of Life, and Hyperemesis Gravidarum Pregnancy Termination Consideration. Adjustments for multiple comparisons were made employing the false discovery rate. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients with hyperemesis gravidarum were enrolled from October 2014 to May 2019. Among the 21 patients providing primary outcome data (12 assigned to gabapentin and 9 to the active comparator arm), 18 were enrolled as outpatients and all 21 were outpatients from days 5 to 7. The study groups' baseline characteristics were well matched. Gabapentin treatment provided a 52% greater reduction in days 5 to 7 baseline adjusted Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis total scores than treatment with active comparator (95% confidence interval, 16-88; P=.01). Most secondary outcomes also favored gabapentin over active comparator treatment including 46% and 49% decreases in baseline adjusted Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis nausea (95% confidence interval, 19-72; P=.005) and vomit and retch subscores (95% confidence interval, 21-77; P=.005), respectively; a 96% increase in baseline adjusted oral nutrition scores (95% confidence interval, 27-165; P=.01); and a 254% difference in global satisfaction of treatment (95% confidence interval, 48-459; P=.03). Relief (P=.06) and desire to continue therapy (P=.06) both showed trends favoring gabapentin treatment but Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy Quality of Life (P=.68) and Hyperemesis Gravidarum Pregnancy Termination Consideration (P=.58) did not. Adverse events were roughly equivalent between the groups. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this small trial, gabapentin was more effective than standard-of-care therapy for reducing nausea and vomiting and increasing oral nutrition and global satisfaction in outpatients with hyperemesis gravidarum. These data build on previous findings in other patient populations supporting gabapentin as a novel antinausea and antiemetic therapy and support further research on gabapentin for this challenging complication of pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MEDICAL-PRACTICE AND THE DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    CHARLTON, BG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1991, 41 (350): : 355 - 356
  • [42] Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of Bumetanide for Neonatal Seizures
    Soul, Janet
    Bergin, Ann
    Stopp, Christian
    Wypij, David
    Staley, Kevin
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2018, 84 : S79 - S79
  • [43] A randomized double-blind controlled trial of automated term dissection
    Elkin, PL
    Bailey, KR
    Ogren, PV
    Bauer, BA
    Chute, CG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1999, : 62 - 66
  • [44] Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial of sibutramine
    Bray, GA
    Ryan, DH
    Gordon, D
    Heidingsfelder, S
    Cerise, F
    Wilson, K
    OBESITY RESEARCH, 1996, 4 (03): : 263 - 270
  • [45] Gabapentin for refractory chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Ryan, Nicole M.
    Birring, Surinder S.
    Gibson, Peter G.
    LANCET, 2012, 380 (9853): : 1583 - 1589
  • [46] Gabapentin in neuropathic pain syndromes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Serpell, MG
    PAIN, 2002, 99 (03) : 557 - 566
  • [47] Effect of Acupressure at P6 on Nausea and Vomiting in Women with Hyperemesis Gravidarum: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Mohd Nafiah, Nor Azila
    Chieng, Wei Keong
    Zainuddin, Ani Amelia
    Chew, Kah Teik
    Kalok, Aida
    Abu, Muhammad Azrai
    Ng, Beng Kwang
    Mohamed Ismail, Nor Azlin
    Nur Azurah, Abdul Ghani
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (17)
  • [48] Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive gabapentin and memantine in obsessive compulsive disorder: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Farnia, Vahid
    Gharehbaghi, Haniyeh
    Alikhani, Mostafa
    Almasi, Afshin
    Golshani, Sanobar
    Tatari, Faeze
    Davarinejad, Omran
    Salemi, Safora
    Bahmani, Dena Sadeghi
    Holsboer-Trachsler, Edith
    Brand, Serge
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2018, 104 : 137 - 143
  • [49] Behavioral and cardiovascular effects of a single dose of gabapentin or melatonin in cats: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Tuleski, Giovana Lais Ruviaro
    Silveira, Matheus Folgearini
    Bastos, Rodrigo Franco
    Pscheidt, Maria Jose Garcia Ribeiro
    Prieto, Wiliam da Silva
    Sousa, Marlos G.
    JOURNAL OF FELINE MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 24 (12) : E524 - E534
  • [50] Administration of Pre-Operative Gabapentin to Patients Undergoing Laparoscopy: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial
    Benton, A.
    Harkins, G.
    Stetter, C.
    Kunselman, A.
    Deimling, T.
    Riley, K.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2019, 20 (04): : S65 - S65