Effect of gabapentin on hyperemesis gravidarum: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

被引:7
作者
Guttuso, Thomas, Jr. [1 ]
Messing, Susan [2 ]
Tu, Xin [4 ]
Mullin, Patrick [5 ]
Shepherd, Rachel [1 ]
Strittmatter, Chad [6 ]
Saha, Sumona [7 ]
Thornburg, Loralei L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Jacobs Sch Med & Biomed Sci, Dept Neurol, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Dept Biostat & Computat Biol, Rochester, NY USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, NY USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Family Med & Publ Hlth, Div Biostat & Bioinformat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Sisters Charity Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Buffalo, NY USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
关键词
clinical trial; maternal-fetal medicine; metoclopramide; nausea; nutrition; obstetrics; ondansetron; pregnancy; vomiting; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA; HOT FLASHES; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; CORTICOSTEROIDS; METOCLOPRAMIDE; ONDANSETRON; OUTCOMES; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100273
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Hyperemesis gravidarum is a disabling disease of nausea, vomiting, and undernutrition in early pregnancy for which there are no effective outpatient therapies. Poor weight gain in hyperemesis gravidarum is associated with several adverse fetal outcomes including preterm delivery, low birthweight, small for gestational age, low 5-minute Apgar scores, and neurodevelopmental delay. Gabapentin is most commonly used clinically for treating neuropathic pain but also substantially reduces chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Pregnancy registry data have shown maternal first-trimester gabapentin monotherapy to be associated with a 1.2% rate of major congenital malformations among 659 infants, which compares favorably with the 1.6% to 2.2% major congenital malformation rate in the general population. Open-label gabapentin treatment in hyperemesis gravidarum was associated with reduced nausea and vomiting and improved oral nutrition. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether gabapentin is more effective than standard-of-care therapy for treating hyperemesis gravidarum. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial was conducted among patients with medically refractory hyperemesis gravidarum requiring intravenous hydration. Patients were randomized (1:1) to either oral gabapentin (1800-2400 mg/d) or an active comparator of either oral ondansetron (24-32 mg/d) or oral metoclopramide (45-60 mg/d) for 7 days. Differences in Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis total scores between treatment groups averaged over days 5 to 7, using intention-to-treat principle employing a linear mixed-effects model adjusted for baseline Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis scores, which served as the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis nausea and vomit and retch subscores, oral nutrition, global satisfaction of treatment, relief, desire to continue therapy, Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy Quality of Life, and Hyperemesis Gravidarum Pregnancy Termination Consideration. Adjustments for multiple comparisons were made employing the false discovery rate. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients with hyperemesis gravidarum were enrolled from October 2014 to May 2019. Among the 21 patients providing primary outcome data (12 assigned to gabapentin and 9 to the active comparator arm), 18 were enrolled as outpatients and all 21 were outpatients from days 5 to 7. The study groups' baseline characteristics were well matched. Gabapentin treatment provided a 52% greater reduction in days 5 to 7 baseline adjusted Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis total scores than treatment with active comparator (95% confidence interval, 16-88; P=.01). Most secondary outcomes also favored gabapentin over active comparator treatment including 46% and 49% decreases in baseline adjusted Motherisk-pregnancy-unique quantification of nausea and emesis nausea (95% confidence interval, 19-72; P=.005) and vomit and retch subscores (95% confidence interval, 21-77; P=.005), respectively; a 96% increase in baseline adjusted oral nutrition scores (95% confidence interval, 27-165; P=.01); and a 254% difference in global satisfaction of treatment (95% confidence interval, 48-459; P=.03). Relief (P=.06) and desire to continue therapy (P=.06) both showed trends favoring gabapentin treatment but Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy Quality of Life (P=.68) and Hyperemesis Gravidarum Pregnancy Termination Consideration (P=.58) did not. Adverse events were roughly equivalent between the groups. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this small trial, gabapentin was more effective than standard-of-care therapy for reducing nausea and vomiting and increasing oral nutrition and global satisfaction in outpatients with hyperemesis gravidarum. These data build on previous findings in other patient populations supporting gabapentin as a novel antinausea and antiemetic therapy and support further research on gabapentin for this challenging complication of pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the effectiveness of ondansetron versus metoclopramide in hyperemesis gravidarum: a randomized clinical trial
    Moradiha, Fatemeh
    Farahmandrad, Sahar
    Gholami, Hamideh
    FRONTIERS IN EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 6 (01):
  • [2] The efficacy of methylprednisolone in the treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study
    Safari, HR
    Fassett, M
    Souter, IC
    Alsulyman, OM
    Goodwin, TM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (04) : 921 - 924
  • [3] Rating of four different foods in women with hyperemesis gravidarum: a randomised controlled trial
    Tan, Gi Ni
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    Hong, Jesrine Gek Shan
    Kartik, Balaraman
    Omar, Siti Zawiah
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (05):
  • [4] Ondansetron versus metoclopramide for managing hyperemesis gravidarum: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Albazee, Ebraheem
    Almahmoud, Lina
    Al-Rshoud, Firas
    Sallam, Dima
    Albzea, Wardah
    Alenezi, Rawan
    Baradwan, Saeed
    Abu-Zaid, Ahmed
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 19 (02) : 162 - 169
  • [5] Gabapentin for spasticity: a randomized, double-blind, place bo-controlled trial
    Formica, A
    Verger, K
    Sol, JM
    Morralla, C
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2005, 124 (03): : 81 - 85
  • [6] Ondansetron Compared With Metoclopramide for Hyperemesis Gravidarum A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Abas, Mohamed Norazam
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    Azmi, Noor
    Omar, Siti Zawiah
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (06) : 1272 - 1279
  • [7] Oral rehydration therapy versus intravenous rehydration therapy in the first 12 h following hospitalization for hyperemesis gravidarum: A randomized controlled trial
    Jabarudin, Wan Nurul Ezyani Wan
    Narayanan, Vallikkannu
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Gunasagran, Yogeeta
    Thavarajan, Rudra Devi
    Kamarudin, Maherah
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 166 (01) : 442 - 450
  • [8] Auriculotherapy as a means of managing nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
    Negarandeh, Reza
    Eghbali, Mohammad
    Janani, Leila
    Dastaran, Farzaneh
    Saatchi, Kiarash
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 40
  • [9] Dextrose Saline Compared With Normal Saline Rehydration of Hyperemesis Gravidarum A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    Norazilah, Mat Jin
    Omar, Siti Zawiah
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (02) : 291 - 298
  • [10] Antiemetic effect of ondansetron versus metoclopramide in nauseous isolated head trauma patients: a double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Alimohammadi, Hossein
    Partovinezhad, Hossein
    Aliniagerdroudbari, Ehsan
    Babaniamansour, Sepideh
    Partovinezhad, Effat
    Shojaee, Majid
    FRONTIERS IN EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 6 (02):