What is important to patients receiving extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for urinary tract calculi?

被引:8
作者
Kouriefs, C [1 ]
Quatan, N [1 ]
Larking, A [1 ]
Watkin, NA [1 ]
Boyd, PJR [1 ]
机构
[1] St Helier Hosp, Dept Urol, Lithotripsy Unit, Surrey, England
关键词
extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy; urinary tract calculi; patient expectations;
D O I
10.1308/147870804993
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Patients' experience and expectations are paramount in the current era of clinical governance. However, there is lack of published information on patients' expectations from extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment for renal stone disease. We conducted a survey to quantify what aspects of ESWL are important purely from the patients' prospective. Patients and Methods: Postal questionnaires were sent out to all patients who attended our unit for ESWL treatment for renal stone disease. The questionnaire referred to 15 aspects of ESWL treatment. Patients were asked to rate each aspect based on a numerical scale from 1 to 10 (1-least important; 10-most important). Results: We posted 340 questionnaires and received 208 valid replies (61%). Stone clearance was statistically the most important aspect of treatment. Staff attitude and explanation of the procedure and outcomes were rated highly. To our surprise, pain control was rated only 8th. Conclusions: Patients' priorities may be different to ours. Surveys like this allow ones to put the appropriate 'weight' on the results of patient satisfaction surveys in order to allocate resources and improve service appropriately.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 435
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
CHAUSSY C, 1980, LANCET, V2, P1265
[2]  
JOYNER S, 2000, UROLITHIASIS, P736
[3]   INCORPORATING PATIENTS PREFERENCES INTO MEDICAL DECISIONS [J].
KASSIRER, JP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (26) :1895-1896
[4]  
Kawano M, 2000, Hinyokika Kiyo, V46, P701
[5]   The patients perspective of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy [J].
Mahmood N. ;
Turner W. ;
Rowgaski K. ;
Almond D. .
International Urology and Nephrology, 1998, 30 (6) :671-675
[6]  
MAROOF M, 1993, J STONE DIS, V5, P240
[7]   The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi [J].
Öbek, C ;
Önal, B ;
Kantay, K ;
Kalkan, M ;
Yalçin, V ;
Öner, A ;
Solok, V ;
Tansu, N .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) :2081-2084
[8]   Do patients expect too much from extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? [J].
Quatan, N ;
Kouriefs, C ;
Larking, A ;
Boyd, PJ .
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2003, 85 (06) :386-388