What do we feed to food-production animals? A review of animal feed ingredients and their potential impacts on human health

被引:173
作者
Sapkota, Amy R.
Lefferts, Lisa Y.
McKenzie, Shawn
Walker, Polly
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Maryland Inst Appl Environm Hlth, Coll Hlth & Human Performance, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Lisa Y Lefferts Consulting, Nellysford, VA USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Ctr Livable Future, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
animal feed; animal waste; concentrated animal feeding operations; fats; human health effects; nontherapeutic antibiotics; rendered animals; roxarsone; zoonoses;
D O I
10.1289/ehp.9760
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Animal feeding practices in the United States have changed considerably over the past century. As large-scale, concentrated production methods have become the predominant model for animal husbandry, animal feeds have been modified to include ingredients ranging from rendered animals and animal waste to antibiotics and organoarsenicals. In this article we review current U.S. animal feeding practices and etiologic agents that have been detected in animal feed. Evidence that current feeding practices may lead to adverse human health impacts is also evaluated. DATA SOURCES: We reviewed published veterinary and human-health literature regarding animal feeding practices, etiologic agents present in feed, and human health effects along with proceedings from animal feed workshops. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted from peer-reviewed articles and books identified using PubMed, Agricola, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Drug Administration, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention databases. DATA SYNTHESIS: Findings emphasize that current animal feeding practices can result in the presence of bacteria, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, prions, arsenicals, and dioxins in feed and animal-based food products. Despite a range of potential human health impacts that could ensue, there are significant data gaps that prevent comprehensive assessments of human health risks associated with animal feed. Limited data are collected at the federal or state level concerning the amounts of specific ingredients used in animal feed, and there are insufficient surveillance systems to monitor etiologic agents '' from farm to fork.'' CONCLUSIONS: Increased funding for integrated veterinary and human health surveillance systems and increased collaboration among feed professionals, animal producers, and veterinary and public health officials is necessary to effectively address these issues.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 670
页数:8
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
*AAFCO, 2004, OFF PUBL
[2]   Comparison of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from humans in the community, broilers, and pigs in Denmark [J].
Aarestrup, FM ;
Agerso, Y ;
Gerner-Smidt, P ;
Madsen, M ;
Jensen, LB .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2000, 37 (02) :127-137
[3]  
Angulo F.J., 2004, HUM HLTH SAF AN FEED
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum, V69, P1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Fact sheet, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2010.01.031
[6]   Arsenic speciation and reactivity in poultry litter [J].
Arai, Y ;
Lanzirotti, A ;
Sutton, S ;
Davis, JA ;
Sparks, DL .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (18) :4083-4090
[7]   Avoparcin used as a growth promoter is associated with the occurrence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium on Danish poultry and pig farms [J].
Bager, F ;
Madsen, M ;
Christensen, J ;
Aarestrup, FM .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1997, 31 (1-2) :95-112
[8]   Photodegradation of roxarsone in poultry litter leachates [J].
Bednar, AJ ;
Garbarino, JR ;
Ferrer, I ;
Rutherford, DW ;
Wershaw, RL ;
Ranville, JF ;
Wildeman, TR .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 302 (1-3) :237-245
[9]  
Bhat R. V., 1999, 3 JOINT FAO WHO UNEP
[10]  
Capucille DJ, 2004, J ANIM SCI, V82, P3038