The Diagnostic Value of Neuropathy Symptom and Change Score, Neuropathy Impairment Score and Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

被引:39
作者
Xiong, Qian [1 ]
Lu, Bing [3 ]
Ye, Hongying [3 ]
Wu, Xia [1 ]
Zhang, Tiansong [2 ]
Li, Yiming [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Affiliated Huashan Hosp, Jingan Branch, Dept Endocrinol,Jingan Dist Cent Hosp, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Affiliated Huashan Hosp, Jingan Branch, Dept Tradit Chinese Med,Jingan Dist Cent Hosp, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Affiliated Huashan Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
关键词
Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic peripheral neuropathy; Neuropathy symptom and change; Neuropathy impairment score; Michigan neuropathy screening instrument; RISK-FACTORS; POLYNEUROPATHY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1159/000441449
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic capabilities of neuropathy symptom and change (NSC) score, neuropathy impairment score (NIS) and Michigan neuropathy screening instrument (MNSI) in diagnosing diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Methods: A total of 131 patients with type II diabetes received NSC, NIS and MNSI scoring systems. Electromyography/nerve conduction velocity (EMG/NCV) test was taken as gold standard. Correlations between EMG/NCV test and the 3 scorings, and their sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy and kappa (K) value were analyzed. Results: The prevalence of DPN was 43.5% according to EMG/NCV findings. EMG/NCV test was significantly positive correlated with all the 3 scorings, highest with NIS scoring (r = 0.653, p < 0.001). Compared with EMG/NCV test, NSC score was most sensitive (85.96%) but least specific (77.03%); NIS score had lower sensitivity (59.65%) but best specificity (98.65%) and accuracy (81.68%). Both had high concordance with EMG/NCV test (K = 0.61).Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MNSI were highest (70.18, 98.65 and 80.15%) at the cutoff values of > 1.0, > 2.5 and > 1.5, respectively (K = 0.58). Conclusions: Both NSC and NIS were accurate and reliable diagnostic methods for DPN. The combined application of NSC and NIS was recommended in DPN diagnosis. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 327
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   A PRACTICAL 2-STEP QUANTITATIVE CLINICAL AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING OF DIABETIC NEUROPATHY [J].
FELDMAN, EL ;
STEVENS, MJ ;
THOMAS, PK ;
BROWN, MB ;
CANAL, N ;
GREENE, DA .
DIABETES CARE, 1994, 17 (11) :1281-1289
[12]   Agreement Is Poor Among Current Criteria Used to Define Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [J].
Fornwalt, Brandon K. ;
Sprague, William W. ;
BeDell, Patrick ;
Suever, Jonathan D. ;
Gerritse, Bart ;
Merlino, John D. ;
Fyfe, Derek A. ;
Leon, Angel R. ;
Oshinski, John N. .
CIRCULATION, 2010, 121 (18) :1985-1991
[13]   Validity of the Neurological Examination in Diagnosing Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy [J].
Hoeliner, Isabella ;
Haslinger, Vera ;
Luetschg, Juerg ;
Mueller, Guido ;
Barbarini, Daniela Seick ;
Fussenegger, Joerg ;
Zanier, Ulrike ;
Saely, Christoph H. ;
Drexel, Heinz ;
Simma, Burkhard .
PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2013, 49 (03) :171-177
[14]  
Jayaprakash P, 2011, INDIAN J MED RES, V133, P645
[15]  
Miralles-Garcia Jose M, 2010, Endocrinol Nutr, V57, P414, DOI 10.1016/j.endonu.2010.05.006
[16]   Validation of Michigan neuropathy screening instrument for diabetic peripheral neuropathy [J].
Moghtaderi, Ali ;
Bakhshipour, Alireza ;
Rashidi, Homayra .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 108 (05) :477-481
[17]  
Moreira Rodrigo O., 2005, Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab, V49, P944, DOI 10.1590/S0004-27302005000600014
[18]  
Nasseri K, 1998, Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, V38, P295
[19]   Simple screening tests for peripheral neuropathy in the diabetes clinic [J].
Perkins, BA ;
Olaleye, D ;
Zinman, B ;
Bril, V .
DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (02) :250-256
[20]  
Perkins Bruce, 2014, Handb Clin Neurol, V126, P235, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-53480-4.00018-7