Rags and Riches: Relative Prices, Non-Homothetic Preferences, and Inequality in India

被引:9
作者
Almas, Ingvild [1 ,2 ]
Kjelsrud, Anders [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Norwegian Sch Econ, Bergen, Norway
[3] Stat Norway, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Oslo, Norway
关键词
India; Asia; cereal; consumption; income; distribution; PENN WORLD TABLE; OF-LIVING INDEX; ENGEL CURVES; REAL INCOME; CPI BIAS; DEMAND; METHODOLOGY; CONSUMER;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.001
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
It is well known that consumption patterns change with income. Relative price changes would therefore affect rich and poor consumers differently. Yet, the standard price indices are not income-specific, and hence, they cannot account for such differences. In this paper, we study consumption inequality in India, while fully allowing for non-homotheticity. We show that the relative price changes during most of the period from 1993 to 2012 were pro-poor, in the sense that they favored the poor relative to the rich. As a result, we also find that conventional measures significantly overstate the rise in real consumption inequality during this period. The main lesson from our study is the importance of accounting for non-homotheticity when measuring inequality. The price index literature has, as of yet, paid relatively little attention to this. In our application, however, it turns out that the allowance for nonhomotheticity is quantitatively much more important than much discussed adjustments, such as those for substitution in consumption. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 121
页数:20
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   ENGEL CURVES AND SYSTEMS OF DEMAND-FUNCTIONS [J].
AASNESS, J ;
RODSETH, A .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1983, 20 (1-3) :95-121
[2]  
Almas I., 2012, GLOBAL INCOME INEQUA
[3]  
Almas I., WORKING PAPER
[4]   International Income Inequality: Measuring PPP Bias by Estimating Engel Curves for Food [J].
Almas, Ingvild .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (02) :1093-1117
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Perspectives on Poverty in India: Stylized Facts from Survey Data
[6]   Top Indian incomes, 1922-2000 [J].
Banerjee, A ;
Piketty, T .
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 19 (01) :1-20
[7]   Quadratic engel curves and consumer demand [J].
Banks, J ;
Blundell, R ;
Lewbel, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1997, 79 (04) :527-539
[8]   INTRODUCTION TO MEASUREMENT WITH THEORY [J].
Barnett, William A. ;
Diewert, W. Erwin ;
Zellner, Arnold .
MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2009, 13 :151-168
[9]   Accounting for Inequality in India: Evidence from Household Expenditures [J].
Cain, J. Salcedo ;
Hasan, Rana ;
Magsombol, Rhoda ;
Tandon, Ajay .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 38 (03) :282-297
[10]   Estimating real income in the United States from 1888 to 1994: Correcting CPI bias using Engel curves [J].
Costa, DL .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2001, 109 (06) :1288-1310