Comparison of two sedation protocols on intraocular pressure and hemodynamic responses during colonoscopy

被引:0
作者
Bayraktaroglu, M. [1 ]
Kurtay, A. [2 ]
Horasanli, E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ankara TOBB Univ Econ & Technol Hosp, Anesthesiol & Reanimat Dept, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Kecioren Training & Res Hosp, Anesthesiol & Reanimat Dept, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Ankara City Hosp, Anesthesiol & Reanimat Dept, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Intraocular pressure; Colonoscopy; Ketamine; Sedation; PROPOFOL; MIDAZOLAM; KETAMINE; COMBINATION; ANESTHESIA; BLIND;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Colonoscopy is one of the most frequently performed interventional endoscopic procedures for diagnosis and treatment. During the procedure, the increase in intraabdominal pressure can cause undesirable spikes in intraocular pressure. In the literature. there are no studies on agent combinations that cause the least effect on intraocular pressure and hemodynamic response in colonoscopic procedures, which are performed more frequently in the elderly, the patient group at the greatest risk for glaucoma. This study aimed to compare ketamine-propofol and ketamine-midazolam protocols in terms of their effects on hemodynamic parameters and intraocular pressure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research was a randomized clinical controlled double-blind study. The study was conducted on 60 healthy adults who underwent elective colonoscopy. Ketamin-midazolam and ketamine-propofol combinations were used. Hemodynamic parameters, intraocular pressures at five different times, and the satisfaction levels of the endoscopist and the patient were recorded. RESULTS: In both groups. there was a statistically significant difference between the pre-procedure intraocular pressure values and the values at the 1st minute of the procedure and at recovery (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the intraocular pressure values of the study groups at any time point (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both combinations can be used safely. The combination of ketamine and propofol in subanesthetic doses provides better sedation without disturbing the hemodynamics and is preferable.
引用
收藏
页码:4295 / 4302
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Aribogan A, 1999, TURK J ANAESTHESIOL, P537
[2]   Effects of Ketamine-Propofol Mixture on Intraocular Pressure and Haemodynamics in Elderly Patients: A Randomised Double-Blind Trial [J].
Aydogan, Mustafa Said ;
Demirel, Soner ;
Erdogan, Mehmet Ali ;
Firat, Penpegul ;
Colak, Cemil ;
Durmus, Mahmut .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2014, 42 (01) :12-18
[3]   The use of a ketamine-propofol combination during monitored anesthesia care [J].
Badrinath, S ;
Avramov, MN ;
Shadrick, M ;
Witt, TR ;
Ivankovich, AD .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (04) :858-862
[4]  
Carter K, 1999, J GLAUCOMA, V8, P204
[5]  
Çelik JB, 2012, TURK J GERIATR, V15, P55
[6]   A combination of midazolam and ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in adult emergency department patients [J].
Chudnofsky, CR ;
Weber, JE ;
Stoyanoff, PJ ;
Colone, PD ;
Wilkerson, MD ;
Hallinen, DL ;
Jaggi, FM ;
Boczar, ME ;
Perry, MA .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 7 (03) :228-235
[7]   A comparison of ketamine-midazolam and ketamine-propofol combinations used for sedation in the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a prospective, single-blind, randomized study [J].
Dal, Tulay ;
Sazak, Hilal ;
Tunc, Mehtap ;
Sahin, Saziye ;
Yilmaz, Aydin .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2014, 6 (06) :742-751
[8]   The Increase of Intra-Abdominal Pressure Can Affect Intraocular Pressure [J].
Ece, Ilhan ;
Vatansev, Celalettin ;
Kucukkartallar, Tevfik ;
Tekin, Ahmet ;
Kartal, Adil ;
Okka, Andmehmet .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
[9]   Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam given via continuous intravenous infusion in intensive care units [J].
Fragen, RJ .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1997, 19 (03) :405-419
[10]   Propofol versus propofol-ketamine sedation for retrobulbar nerve block: Comparison of sedation quality, intraocular pressure changes, and recovery profiles [J].
Frey, K ;
Sukhani, R ;
Pawlowski, J ;
Pappas, AL ;
Mikat-Stevens, M ;
Slogoff, S .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (02) :317-321