China's textbook approach to regulatory reform of the natural gas market

被引:4
|
作者
Boute, Anatole [1 ]
Fang, Mandy Meng [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Law, Shatin, Lee Shau Kee Bldg, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Law, Kowloon Tong, Li Dak Sum Yip Yio Chin Acad Bldg, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
China gas Market reform; Energy law; Textbook approach; Price deregulation; Third-party access; Unbundling; ENERGY; INDUSTRY; STATE; LEGAL; LAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.jup.2022.101369
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Natural gas, as a transition fuel, is considered essential for China's decarbonization and local air protection policy, yet the regulatory structure China relies on to promote gas use remains under-researched. China's central government recognizes the need for market-based reforms of the gas sector, but what regulatory and policy adjustments are necessary to reorganize gas supply on a market basis? The textbook approach to energy market reform, and its implementation in the European Union, provides important guidance on how to create a regulatory basis to support competition in gas supply, provided national institutional characteristics are taken into account. This article engages in a comparative analysis of China's gas market reform policies and their implementation at the provincial level, focusing on Guangdong, a laboratory of economic reforms in China. The analysis demonstrates that reforms in 2019-2021 integrated key aspects of the textbook model in China's gas regulations, including third-party access, price deregulation and ownership unbundling. However, the textbook is of limited use to address remaining institutional barriers to reform, including resistance of distribution monopolies to competition from state-owned enterprises. Guangdong's experience shows that reform is possible, but only if accompanied by institutional and pricing adjustments reconciling vested interests with competition.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] China's Insurance Regulatory Reform, Corporate Governance Behavior and Insurers' Governance Effectiveness
    Li, Huicong
    Zhang, Hongliang
    Tsai, Sang-Bing
    Qiu, Aichao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 14 (10):
  • [12] Making a Global Gas Market: Territoriality and Production Networks in Liquefied Natural Gas
    Bridge, Gavin
    Bradshaw, Michael
    ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 93 (03) : 215 - 240
  • [13] Does natural gas pricing reform establish an effective mechanism in China: A policy evaluation perspective
    Lin, Boqiang
    Li, Zhensheng
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 282
  • [14] Countering Capture: Elite Networks and Government Responsiveness in China's Land Market Reform
    Jiang, Junyan
    Zeng, Yu
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2020, 82 (01) : 13 - 28
  • [15] Power market reform in China: Motivations, progress, and recommendations
    Guo, Hongye
    Davidson, Michael R.
    Chen, Qixin
    Zhang, Da
    Jiang, Nan
    Xia, Qing
    Kang, Chongqing
    Zhang, Xiliang
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 145 (145)
  • [16] An Assessment of the Security of China's Natural Gas Supply System Using Two Network Models
    Zhang, Mingqi
    Su, Meirong
    Lu, Weiwei
    Su, Chunhua
    ENERGIES, 2015, 8 (12): : 13710 - 13725
  • [17] Hukou and land: market reform and rural displacement in China
    Andreas, Joel
    Zhan, Shaohua
    JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2016, 43 (04) : 798 - 827
  • [18] The hybrid regulatory regime in turbulent times: The role of the state in China's stock market crisis in 2015-2016
    Li, Chen
    Zheng, Huanhuan
    Liu, Yunbo
    REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2022, 16 (02) : 392 - 408
  • [19] Accounts Receivable Reform and Financing Constraints: Evidence from China's A-Share Market
    Chen, Yinfan
    Huang, Yeni
    Wen, Mengyao
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2024, 60 (09) : 2000 - 2025
  • [20] Multi-agent mixed complementary simulation of natural gas upstream market liberalization in China
    Gong, Chengzhu
    Wu, Desheng
    Gong, Nianjiao
    Qi, Rui
    ENERGY, 2020, 200