A disaster diplomacy perspective of acute public health events

被引:9
作者
Whittaker, Charlie [1 ]
Fruhauf, Anna [2 ]
Burthem, Samuel John [3 ]
Parry, Rebecca Shoshanah [4 ]
Kotikalapudi, Meghana [5 ]
Liang, Yihui [1 ]
Barker, Mary Moffett [6 ]
Patel, Parth Rohit [7 ]
Kelman, Ilan [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Sch Publ Hlth, London, England
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Publ Hlth & Policy, London, England
[3] UCL, Sch Publ Policy, London, England
[4] St Georges Univ London, London, England
[5] Newcastle Univ, Fac Med Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[6] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York, N Yorkshire, England
[7] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge, England
[8] UCL, London, England
[9] Univ Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
关键词
China; Cuba; health diplomacy; medical diplomacy; polio; public health; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS); vaccine diplomacy; CHINA; FRAMEWORK; POLITICS; RISK; BOYCOTT;
D O I
10.1111/disa.12306
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Conceptions of acute public health events typically assume that they are tackled exclusively or principally through technical and medical solutions. Yet health and politics are inexorably linked. To better understand this link, this paper adopts a disaster diplomacy perspective for analysing and assessing the impacts of acute public health events on diplomatic outcomes. Two gaps in understanding disaster-health-politics connections are addressed: (i) how health interventions can impact diplomatic endeavours, especially for (ii) acute public health events. Three diverse case studies are interpreted from a disaster diplomacy perspective: Cuba's medical diplomacy, China and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), and polio vaccination. Disaster diplomacy permits deeper investigation and analysis of connections amongst health, disaster, and diplomatic activities by viewing efforts on acute public health events as being political through disaster risk reduction (beforehand) and disaster response (during and afterwards). Understanding improves how health interventions affect diplomacy and on disaster diplomacy's limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:S173 / S195
页数:23
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Controlling SARS: a review on China's response compared with other SARS-affected countries [J].
Ahmad, Amena ;
Krumkamp, Ralf ;
Reintjes, Ralf .
TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2009, 14 :36-45
[2]  
Anderson MaryB., 1999, DO NO HARM AID CAN S
[3]  
[Anonymous], CHINA ENGAGES GLOBAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, WHAT IS A DISASTER
[5]  
[Anonymous], 10 FACTS POL ER
[6]  
[Anonymous], MULTI TRACK DIPLOMAC
[7]  
[Anonymous], P 10 WORLD C TOB HLT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1983, INTERPRETATIONS CALA
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2004, INT REV RED CROSS
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Terminology