Stocker Beef Production on Low-Water-Input Systems in Response to Legume Inclusion: II. Water Footprint

被引:10
作者
Baxter, Lisa L. [1 ]
West, Charles P. [1 ]
Sarturi, Jhones O. [2 ]
Brown, C. Philip [1 ]
Green, Paul E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Mail Stop 2122, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Anim & Food Sci, Mail Stop 2141, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
USE EFFICIENCY; INTEGRATING COTTON; CATTLE PRODUCTION;
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2017.05.0289
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Information on the water footprint of pasture-based beef production is useful for optimizing the allocation of groundwater to crop and livestock production. The objective of this research was to determine the effect of including legumes on three water footprints of grass-based, beef stocker grazing systems with respect to observed and total (observed plus predicted from hay production) liveweight gain (LWG). Water inputs for the calculations included total or effective rainfall, total or corrected drip irrigation, and water directly consumed by the steers. When including rainfall in the calculation, water footprints were 16.2 to 40.5 vs. 1.7 to 8.6 m(3) kg(-1) LWG when including groundwater only. Inclusion of legumes into the system reduced each water footprint with respect to observed LWG in all years (P < 0.01). When total LWG was considered, the water footprint was lower in the grass-legume system if rainfall (total or effective) was included (P < 0.01) but greater if the evaluation was restricted to irrigation and drinking water as inputs (P < 0.01). Overall, including legumes reduced the water footprint of beef LWG, largely because of greater rates of gain from the greater quality forages. Quantifying water use in the stocker phase adds a missing component in evaluating limited resources in the beef production life cycle. Managing legumes in mixture with warm-season grasses and as a protein bank can increase the efficiency of beef grazing systems, resulting in an overall lower water footprint for animal weight gain.
引用
收藏
页码:2303 / 2312
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Allen RG., 1998, Journal of Hydrology, V285, P19
[2]   Integrating Cotton and Beef Production in the Texas Southern High Plains: I. Water Use and Measures of Productivity [J].
Allen, V. G. ;
Brown, C. P. ;
Kellison, R. ;
Green, P. ;
Zilverberg, C. J. ;
Johnson, P. ;
Weinheimer, J. ;
Wheeler, T. ;
Segarra, E. ;
Acosta-Martinez, V. ;
Zobeck, T. M. ;
Conkwright, J. C. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2012, 104 (06) :1625-1642
[3]   An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals [J].
Allen, V. G. ;
Batello, C. ;
Berretta, E. J. ;
Hodgson, J. ;
Kothmann, M. ;
Li, X. ;
Mclvor, J. ;
Milne, J. ;
Morris, C. ;
Peeters, A. ;
Sanderson, M. .
GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2011, 66 (01) :2-28
[4]   Integrating cotton and beef production to reduce water withdrawal from the Ogallala aquifer in the southern high plains [J].
Allen, VG ;
Brown, CP ;
Kellison, R ;
Segarra, E ;
Wheeler, T ;
Dotray, PA ;
Conkwright, JC ;
Green, CJ ;
Acosta-Martinez, V .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2005, 97 (02) :556-567
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, NUTR REQ BEEF CATTL, DOI DOI 10.17226/19014
[6]   Water-use efficiency on irrigated dairy farms in northern Victoria and southern New South Wales [J].
Armstrong, DP ;
Knee, JE ;
Doyle, PT ;
Pritchard, KE ;
Gyles, OA .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2000, 40 (05) :643-653
[7]   Stocker Beef Production on Low-Water-Input Systems in Response to Legume Inclusion: I. Forage and Animal Responses [J].
Baxter, Lisa L. ;
West, Charles P. ;
Brown, C. Philip ;
Green, Paul E. .
CROP SCIENCE, 2017, 57 (04) :2294-2302
[8]   ESTIMATION OF THE WATER REQUIREMENT FOR BEEF-PRODUCTION IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
BECKETT, JL ;
OLTJEN, JW .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1993, 71 (04) :818-826
[9]   WATER-USE EFFICIENCY AND YIELD OF SAINFOIN AND ALFALFA [J].
BOLGER, TP ;
MATCHES, AG .
CROP SCIENCE, 1990, 30 (01) :143-148
[10]  
Brouwer C., 1986, IRRIGATION WATER MAN