Evoked potentials after painful cutaneous electrical stimulation depict pain relief during a conditioned pain modulation

被引:17
|
作者
Hoeffken, Oliver [1 ]
Oezguel, Oezuem S. [1 ]
Enax-Krumova, Elena K. [1 ]
Tegenthoff, Martin [1 ]
Maier, Christoph [2 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Berufsgenossenschaftl Univ Klinikum Bergmannsheil, Dept Neurol, Burkle de la Camp Pl 1, D-44789 Bochum, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Berufsgenossenschaftl Univ Klinikum Bergmannsheil, Dept Pain Med, Burkle de la Camp Pl 1, D-44789 Bochum, Germany
来源
BMC NEUROLOGY | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
CPM; Electrically evoked potentials; Cold pressor test; Pain relief; NOXIOUS INHIBITORY CONTROLS; TEST-RETEST-RELIABILITY; SMALL-FIBER NEUROPATHY; HEALTHY-SUBJECTS; CO2-LASER STIMULATION; PERCEPTION; HUMANS; REFLEX; WOMEN; SKIN;
D O I
10.1186/s12883-017-0946-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) evaluates the pain modulating effect of a noxious conditioning stimulus (CS) on another noxious test stimulus (TS), mostly based solely on subjective pain ratings. We used painful cutaneous electrical stimulation (PCES) to induce TS in a novel CPM-model. Additionally, to evaluate a more objective parameter, we recorded the corresponding changes of cortical evoked potentials (PCES-EP). Methods: We examined the CPM-effect in 17 healthy subjects in a randomized controlled cross-over design during immersion of the non-dominant hand into 10 degrees C or 24 degrees C cold water (CS). Using three custom-built concentric surface electrodes, electrical stimuli were applied on the dominant hand, inducing pain of 40-60 on NRS 0-100 (TS). At baseline, during and after CS we assessed the electrically induced pain intensity and electrically evoked potentials recorded over the central electrode (Cz). Results: Only in the 10 degrees C-condition, both pain (52.6 +/- 4.4 (baseline) vs. 30.3 +/- 12.5 (during CS)) and amplitudes of PCES-EP (42.1 +/- 13.4 mu V (baseline) vs. 28.7 +/- 10.5 mu V (during CS)) attenuated during CS and recovered there after (all p < 0.001). In the 10 degrees C-condition changes of subjective pain ratings during electrical stimulation and amplitudes of PCES-EP correlated significantly with each other (r = 0.5) and with CS pain intensity (r = 0.5). Conclusions: PCES-EPs are a quantitative measure of pain relief, as changes in the electrophysiological response are paralleled by a consistent decrease in subjective pain ratings. This novel CPM paradigm is a feasible method, which could help to evaluate the function of the endogenous pain modulation processes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evoked potentials after painful cutaneous electrical stimulation depict pain relief during a conditioned pain modulation
    Oliver Höffken
    Özüm S. Özgül
    Elena K. Enax-Krumova
    Martin Tegenthoff
    Christoph Maier
    BMC Neurology, 17
  • [2] Conditioned pain modulation using painful cutaneous electrical stimulation or simply habituation?
    Eitner, L.
    Oezguel, Oe. S.
    Enax-Krumova, E. K.
    Vollert, J.
    Maier, C.
    Hoeffken, O.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2018, 22 (07) : 1281 - 1290
  • [3] Painful Cutaneous Electrical Stimulation vs. Heat Pain as Test Stimuli in Conditioned Pain Modulation
    Enax-Krumova, Elena
    Plaga, Ann-Christin
    Schmidt, Kimberly
    Oezguel, Oezuem S.
    Eitner, Lynn B.
    Tegenthoff, Martin
    Hoeffken, Oliver
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (10) : 1 - 17
  • [4] Pain-related evoked potentials after intraepidermal electrical stimulation to Aδ and C fibers in patients with neuropathic pain
    Omori, Shigeki
    Isose, Sagiri
    Misawa, Sonoko
    Watanabe, Keisuke
    Sekiguchi, Yukari
    Shibuya, Kazumoto
    Beppu, Minako
    Amino, Hiroshi
    Kuwabara, Satoshi
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2017, 121 : 43 - 48
  • [5] Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and conditioned pain modulation influence the perception of pain in humans
    Liebano, R. E.
    Vance, C. G.
    Rakel, B. A.
    Lee, J. E.
    Cooper, N. A.
    Marchand, S.
    Walsh, D. M.
    Sluka, K. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 17 (10) : 1539 - 1546
  • [6] The influence of intensity and duration of a painful conditioning stimulation on conditioned pain modulation in volunteers
    Razavi, M.
    Hansson, P. T.
    Johansson, B.
    Leffler, A. -S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2014, 18 (06) : 853 - 861
  • [7] Posttraumatic headache: pain related evoked potentials (PREP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) to assess the pain modulatory function
    Jessen, Julia
    Hoeffken, Oliver
    Schwenkreis, Peter
    Tegenthoff, Martin
    Oezguel, Oezuem Simal
    Enax-Krumova, Elena
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [8] Pleasant Pain Relief and Inhibitory Conditioned Pain Modulation: A Psychophysical Study
    Bitar, Nathalie
    Marchand, Serge
    Potvin, Stephane
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2018, 2018
  • [9] Chemo-somatosensory evoked potentials: A sensitive tool to assess conditioned pain modulation?
    Kunz, Miriam
    Mohammadian, Parvaneh
    Renner, Bertold
    Roscher, Stephan
    Kobal, Gerd
    Lautenbacher, Stefan
    SOMATOSENSORY AND MOTOR RESEARCH, 2014, 31 (02) : 100 - 109
  • [10] Conditioned Pain Modulation in Children: The Effects of Painful and Nonpainful Conditioning Stimuli
    Hoehn, Jessica L.
    Dahlquist, Lynnda M.
    Zeroth, Julia A.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2022, 23 (07) : 1208 - 1219