Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information

被引:94
作者
Rosenbaum, Sarah E. [1 ]
Glenton, Claire [2 ]
Oxman, Andrew D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Knowledge Ctr Hlth Serv, Dept Commun, N-0130 Oslo, Norway
[2] SINTEF, Dept Global Hlth, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Knowledge translation; Health numeracy; Risk communication; Systematic reviews; Information design; Randomized controlled trial; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH-RISK; NUMERACY; ABSTRACTS; DOCTORS; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To measure the effects of a summary-of-findings (SoF) table on user satisfaction, understanding, and time spent finding key results in a Cochrane review. Study Design and Setting: We randomized participants in an evidence-based practice workshop (randomized controlled trial [RCT] I) and a Cochrane Collaboration entities meeting (RCT II) to receive a Cochrane review with or without an SoF table. In RCT 1, we measured user satisfaction. In RCT II, we measured correct comprehension and time spent finding key results. Results: RCT I: Participants with the SoF table (n = 47) were more likely to "agree" or "strongly agree" that it was easy to find results for important outcomes than (n = 25) participants without the SoF table-68% vs. 40% (P = 0.021). RCT 11: Participants with the SoF table (n = 18) were more likely to correctly answer two questions regarding results than (n = 15) those without the SoF table: 93% vs. 44% (P = 0.003) and 87% vs. 11% (P < 0.001). Participants with the SoF table spent an average of 90 seconds to find key information compared with 4 minutes for participants without the SoF table (P = 0.002). Conclusion: In two small trials, we found that inclusion of an SoF table in a review improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key findings compared with reviews with no SoF table. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 626
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Rethinking health numeracy: A multidisciplinary literature review
    Ancker, Jessica S.
    Kaufman, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2007, 14 (06) : 713 - 721
  • [2] Design features of graphs in health risk communication: A systematic review
    Ancker, Jessica S.
    Senathirajah, Yalini
    Kukafka, Rita
    Starren, Justin B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2006, 13 (06) : 608 - 618
  • [3] The impact of open access upon public health
    不详
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2006, 3 (05) : 563 - 563
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, ACP Journal Club
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2007, Psychological science in the public interest, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1539-6053.2008.00033.X
  • [6] Barry H C, 2001, J Am Board Fam Pract, V14, P437
  • [7] The information-seeking behaviour of doctors: a review of the evidence
    Davies, Karen
    [J]. HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, 2007, 24 (02) : 78 - 94
  • [8] Delamothe T, 1999, BRIT MED J, V319, P580
  • [9] Open access publishing takes off - The dream is now achievable
    Delamothe, T
    Smith, R
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7430): : 1 - 3
  • [10] Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests
    Edwards, A. G. K.
    Evans, R.
    Dundon, J.
    Haigh, S.
    Hood, K.
    Elwyn, G. J.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (04):