Oncologic outcomes in minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma

被引:0
作者
Devaud, Nicolas A. [1 ]
Yeung, Jonathan C. [2 ]
Darling, Gail E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Arturo Lopez Perez FALP, Inst Oncol, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Toronto, Thorac Surg Univ Hlth Network UHN, Dept Surg, Div Thorac Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY | 2021年 / 6卷
关键词
Outcomes; cancer; esophagectomy; minimally invasive surgery; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LIMITED TRANSHIATAL RESECTION; SURVIVAL; CANCER; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; ADENOCARCINOMA; COMPLICATIONS; MULTICENTER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.21037/vats-2019-mie-05
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Esophagectomy, with clear surgical margins and appropriate lymph node dissection, is the mainstay of curative intent treatment in esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) including total MIE, hybrid and robotic approaches has become more frequent. Whether or not MIE offers the same oncologic outcomes as open esophagectomy (OE) is an unanswered question to be addressed in this review. A literature review was conducted using the search terms esophageal cancer, esophagectomy, outcomes, minimally invasive surgery, survival, lymph node assessment. Relevant studies were identified by two of the authors (NAD and GED). Studies reporting short terms outcomes consistently report decreased frequency of pneumonia, decreased blood loss and shorter length of stay. Margin status, appears to be similar while lymph node harvest is similar or better compared to open surgery. Overall survival (OS) is at least similar to open surgery but in several recent reports, survival after MIE is superior. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) appears to be improved with MIE within the first 6 months but similar thereafter. MIE offers at least equivalent outcomes in terms of resection margins and lymph node harvest and long-term survival data. MIE offers earlier recovery from surgery with improved HRQOL within the first 6 months postoperatively.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
    Ahmadi, Negar
    Crnic, Agnes
    Seely, Andrew J.
    Sundaresan, Sudhir R.
    Villeneuve, P. James
    Maziak, Donna E.
    Shamji, Farid M.
    Gilbert, Sebastien
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (04): : 1892 - 1900
  • [2] Postoperative short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Akhtar, Naeem M.
    Chen, Donglai
    Zhao, Yuhuan
    Dane, David
    Xue, Yuhang
    Wang, Wenjia
    Zhang, Jiaheng
    Sang, Yonghua
    Chen, Chang
    Chen, Yongbing
    [J]. THORACIC CANCER, 2020, 11 (06) : 1465 - 1475
  • [3] Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Biere, Surya S. A. Y.
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    Maas, Kirsten W.
    Bonavina, Luigi
    Rosman, Camiel
    Roig Garcia, Josep
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G.
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    de lange, Elly S. M.
    Bonjer, H. Jaap
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829) : 1887 - 1892
  • [4] Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.
    Birkmeyer, JD
    Siewers, AE
    Finlayson, EVA
    Stukel, TA
    Lucas, FL
    Batista, I
    Welch, HG
    Wennberg, DE
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) : 1128 - 1137
  • [5] A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy
    Burdall, Oliver C.
    Boddy, Alexander P.
    Fullick, James
    Blazeby, Jane
    Krysztopik, Richard
    Streets, Christopher
    Hollowood, Andrew
    Barham, Christopher P.
    Titcomb, Dan
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (02): : 431 - 437
  • [6] Cuschieri A, 1992, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V37, P7
  • [7] Does Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE) Provide for Comparable Oncologic Outcomes to Open Techniques? A Systematic Review
    Dantoc, Marc M.
    Cox, Michael R.
    Eslick, Guy D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (03) : 486 - 494
  • [8] Medical progress - Esophageal cancer
    Enzinger, PC
    Mayer, RJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (23) : 2241 - 2252
  • [9] Non-inferiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy: an 8-year retrospective case series
    Findlay, L.
    Yao, C.
    Bennett, D. H.
    Byrom, R.
    Davies, N.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (09): : 3681 - 3689
  • [10] Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes
    Guo, Wei
    Ma, Xiao
    Yang, Su
    Zhu, Xiaoli
    Qin, Wei
    Xiang, Jiaqing
    Lerut, Toni
    Li, Hecheng
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (09): : 3873 - 3881