Multicenter Evaluation of the Etest Gradient Diffusion Method for Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

被引:0
作者
Bailey, Adam L. [1 ]
Armstrong, Tom [2 ]
Dwivedi, Hari-Prakash [2 ]
Denys, Gerald A. [3 ]
Hindler, Janet [4 ]
Campeau, Shelley [4 ,6 ]
Traczewski, Maria [5 ]
Humphries, Romney [4 ,6 ]
Burnham, Carey-Ann D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Immunol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] bioMerieux Inc, Hazelwood, MO USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Clin Microbiol Inst Inc, Wilsonville, OR USA
[6] Accelerate Diagnost, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Etest; gradient diffusion method; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Enterobacteriaceae; ceftolozane-tazobactam; IN-VITRO ACTIVITY; COMPLICATED INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS; URINARY-TRACT-INFECTIONS; CEFTAZIDIME-AVIBACTAM; KLEBSIELLA-PNEUMONIAE; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; LEVOFLOXACIN; HOSPITALS;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.00717-18
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a novel beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (in combination with metronidazole) and complicated urinary tract infections. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the C/T Etest, a gradient diffusion method. C/T Etest was compared to broth microdilution (BMD) for 51 Enterobacteriaceae challenge isolates and 39 Pseudomonas aeruginosa challenge isolates at three clinical sites. Essential agreement (EA) between the methods ranged from 47 to 49/51 (92.2 to 96.1%) for the Enterobacteriaceae, and categorical agreement (CA) ranged from 49 to 51/51 (96.1 to 100.0%). EA and CA for P. aeruginosa were 100% at all sites. The C/T Etest was also compared to BMD for susceptibility testing on 966 clinical isolates (793 Enterobacteriaceae, including 167 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 159 Escherichia coil isolates, in addition to 173 P. aeruginosa isolates) collected at four clinical sites. EA between Etest and BMD was 96.9% for Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 98.8% for P. aeruginosa isolates. Within the Enterobacteriaceae, isolates from each species examined had >96% CA. For the clinical isolates, no very major errors were identified but two major errors were found (one for K. pneumoniae and one for Providencia rettgers). By BMD, 47.0% of Enterobacteriaceae and 46.2% of P. aeruginosa challenge strains were nonsusceptible to C/T by CLSI breakpoint criteria; 8.2% of clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 12.1% of clinical P. aeruginosa isolates were nonsusceptible to C/T by CLSI breakpoint criteria. In conclusion, Etest is accurate and reproducible for C/T susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Comparison of antimicrobial activity between ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam against multidrug-resistant isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Alatoom, Adnan
    Elsayed, Hashim
    Lawlor, Karen
    AbdelWareth, Laila
    El-Lababidi, Rania
    Cardona, Lysettee
    Mooty, Mohammad
    Bonilla, Maria-Fernanda
    Nusair, Ahmad
    Mirza, Imran
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 62 : 39 - 43
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, M100 CLSI, V28th
  • [3] Evaluation of the In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Meropenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates
    Buehrle, Deanna J.
    Shields, Ryan K.
    Chen, Liang
    Hao, Binghua
    Press, Ellen G.
    Alkrouk, Ammar
    Potoski, Brian A.
    Kreiswirth, Barry N.
    Clancy, Cornelius J.
    Nguyen, M. Hong
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 60 (05) : 3227 - 3231
  • [4] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2015, M7A10 CLSI
  • [5] del Barrio-Tofino E, 2017, ANTIMICROB AGENTS CH, V61, DOI [10.1128/aac.01589-17, 10.1128/AAC.01589-17]
  • [6] Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Various Resistance Patterns Isolated in U.S. Hospitals (2011-2012)
    Farrell, David J.
    Flamm, Robert K.
    Sader, Helio S.
    Jones, Ronald N.
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2013, 57 (12) : 6305 - 6310
  • [7] RETRACTED: Comparison of Etest to Broth Microdilution for Testing of Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Ceftolozane-Tazobactam (Retracted article. See vol. 56, 2018)
    Flynt, Lauren K.
    Veve, Michael P.
    Samuel, Linoj P.
    Tibbetts, Robert J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 55 (01) : 334 - 335
  • [8] Fraile-Ribot PA, 2017, ANTIMICROB AGENTS CH, V61, DOI [10.1128/AAC.01117-17, 10.1128/aac.01117-17]
  • [9] Persistent Bacteremia from Pseudomonas aeruginosa with In Vitro Resistance to the Novel Antibiotics Ceftolozane-Tazobactam and Ceftazidime-Avibactam
    Gangcuangco, Louie Mar
    Clark, Patricia
    Stewart, Cynthia
    Miljkovic, Goran
    Saul, Zane K.
    [J]. CASE REPORTS IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 2016
  • [10] Susceptibility of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam and Ceftazidime-Avibactam Against a Collection of β-Lactam-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria
    Gonzalez, Mark D.
    McMullen, Allison R.
    Wallace, Meghan A.
    Crotty, Matthew P.
    Ritchie, David J.
    Burnham, Carey-Ann D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 37 (02) : 174 - 176