Infrastructure in developing and transition countries: Risk and protection

被引:4
作者
Freeman, PK [1 ]
Pflug, GC
机构
[1] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
[2] Inst Stat & Decis Support, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
natural catastrophes; infrastructure protection; risk management;
D O I
10.1111/1539-6924.00340
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This article examines two possible strategies for financing post-disaster infrastructure rehabilitation in developing and transition countries: relying on ex ante financing instruments (including insurance, catastrophe bonds, and other risk-transfer instruments) and ex post borrowing or credit. Insurance and other ex ante instruments will increase a country's stability, especially if the government authorities have a difficult time borrowing or otherwise raising funds after a major disaster; however, these instruments have an opportunity cost and can reduce the country's economic growth potential. The cost-benefit tradeoff is therefore one between economic growth through infrastructure investment and added solvency and stability for the economy. This article develops a model to illustrate this tradeoff. The model, which views the infrastructure of a developing or transition country as a nondiversifiable portfolio that generates returns, can provide a basis for evaluating alternative financing options depending on the country's objectives in terms of growth, solvency, and stability.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 609
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, WORLD DEV REPORT 199
[2]  
ARRIENS WTL, 1999, IDNRESCAP REG M AS R
[3]  
Berliner B., 1982, Limits of Insurability of Risks
[4]  
BORCH K, 1992, EC INSURANCE
[5]  
*DTSCH BANK, 1999, EM MARK POL PAP
[6]  
FREEMAN PK, 1999, INFRASTRUCTURE NATUR
[7]  
FREEMAN PK, IN PRESS J ENV DEV
[8]  
Friedman D., 1987, US HURRICANES WINDST
[9]  
HODGSON A, 1997, FINANCIAL RISK MANAG
[10]  
MCKELLAR L, 1999, SIMULATING MACROECON