Application of Dual Concern Theory in Elucidating Conflict Behavior in Infrastructure Public-Private Partnership Projects

被引:7
|
作者
Musenero, Leah [1 ]
Baroudi, Bassam [1 ]
Gunawan, Indra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Business Sch, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
Public-private partnership (PPP); Conflict management (CM); Dual concern theory (DCT); Infrastructure; MANAGEMENT STYLES; MODEL; NEGOTIATION; STRATEGIES; OUTCOMES; PPP; PERFORMANCE; ALLOCATION; INNOVATION; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002099
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Conflict and its management are prevailing challenges in infrastructure public-private partnership (PPP) projects. In developing effective conflict management (CM) systems for PPPs, the consideration of behavior and attitudes of PPP project parties is valuable given their contribution to escalation and deescalation of conflict. In order to guide the incorporation of behavior and attitudes in the CM process for infrastructure PPPs, this paper examines how the behavioral patterns and corresponding CM styles proposed by the dual concern theory (DCT) relate to CM in infrastructure PPPs. Behavioral tendencies of PPP project parties in conflict situations are scrutinized based on their concern for their own and/or others' outcome and subsequent inclination toward the five CM styles (integrating, obliging, dominating, avoiding, and compromising) depicted by the DCT. The results demonstrate, in some part, that there is sufficient connectivity to support the application of the DCT in CM of infrastructure PPPs. On that basis, a conceptual framework that incorporates behavioral aspects in CM for infrastructure PPPs has been developed. This framework fills a theoretical gap in existing knowledge regarding conflict and can be applied to develop strategies for constructively managing conflict in infrastructure PPP practice.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of the Critical Dispute Factors in Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects
    Gunduz, Murat
    Naji, Khalid K.
    Al-Sharafi, Samar
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [2] Operational Risk Management of Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: A Bibliometric Literature Review
    Jiang, Weiling
    Yang, Qianying
    Jiang, Jie
    Martek, Igor
    Gao, Fanjie
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (11)
  • [3] School infrastructure procurement by Public-Private Partnership: In the public interest?
    Benade, Leon
    POLICY FUTURES IN EDUCATION, 2025,
  • [4] Ex Post Risk Management in Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects
    Xiong, Wei
    Zhao, Xianbo
    Yuan, Jing-Feng
    Luo, Sai
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 48 (03) : 76 - 89
  • [5] Sustainable performance assessment of public-private partnership infrastructure projects in Ghana
    Akomea-Frimpong, Isaac
    Jin, Xiaohua
    Osei-Kyei, Robert
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [6] Determining the range of negotiable prices for public-private partnership infrastructure projects: a simulation approach
    Afshar, Arsalan Zakeri
    Abbasianjahromi, Hamidreza
    Mirhosseini, S. Mohammad
    Ehsanifar, Mohammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUILDING PATHOLOGY AND ADAPTATION, 2025, 43 (01) : 50 - 74
  • [7] The attractiveness of public-private partnership for road projects in India
    Malek, Mohammed Shakil
    Zala, Laxmansinh
    JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2022, : 111 - 120
  • [8] Risk evaluation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure public-private partnership projects in China using fuzzy TOPSIS
    Liu, Jicheng
    Wei, Qiushuang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 189 : 211 - 222
  • [9] RISK MANAGEMENT PRACTICE IN CHINA'S PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS
    Ke, Yongjian
    Wang, ShouQing
    Chan, Albert P. C.
    JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 18 (05) : 675 - 684
  • [10] Risk Factors in IT Public-Private Partnership Projects
    Ghribi, Souhir
    Hudon, Pierre-Andre
    Mazouz, Bachir
    PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY, 2019, 24 (04) : 321 - 343