Mild Pyrolysis of Manually Pressed and Liquid Nitrogen Treated De-Lipid Cake of Nannochloropsis Oculata for Bioenergy Utilisation

被引:1
作者
Ali, Mehmood [1 ,2 ]
Watson, Ian A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Syst Power & Energy Res Div, Sch Engn, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
[2] NED Univ Engn & Technol, Environm Engn Dept, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
关键词
Hydraulic pressing; Liquid nitrogen (LN2); Microalgae; Mild pyrolysis; Nannochloropsis oculata; Torrefaction; THERMOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; MICROALGAE BIOMASS; TORREFACTION; ENERGY; PRETREATMENT; EXTRACTION; BIODIESEL; BIOFUELS; OIL;
D O I
10.1002/ente.201700805
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Due to the damaging impacts of continued use of fossil fuels, there is global interest in developing sustainable biofuel production to reduce society's dependency on carbon based energy resources. Microalgae cultivation can contribute to CO2 fixation from the atmosphere, while simultaneously producing a source of lipids from the biomass for third generation biodiesel fuel production. The residual de-lipid cake left after lipid extraction can be treated with thermochemical techniques (such as mild pyrolysis) to produce solid biochar as an end product with a higher energy density and lower moisture content offering advantages for downstream processing or carbon sequestration. De-lipid cake was produced by solvent extraction from Nannochloropsis oculata that had been manually pressed and/or treated with liquid nitrogen (LN2). The de-lipid cake was thermally treated at 200 degrees C or 300 degrees C under partial vacuum in an oxygen free atmosphere. The solid biochar produced had a reduced moisture content (MC) resulting in a mass reduction of 25 and 66 wt% of de-lipid cake without LN2 and treatment at 200 degrees C and 300 degrees C, respectively, while with LN2 treated cake the mass reduction was 23 and 67 wt% at 200 degrees C and 300 degrees C. The higher heating value of the control sample (without any manual pressing or LN2 treatment) was 23.35 MJ kg(-1), while for the control sample it was enhanced to 26.82 and 30.56 MJ kg(-1) with treatment at 200 degrees C and 300 degrees C, respectively. With LN2 treated samples with pressing the HHV was 21.98 MJ kg(-1) for control sample as compared to 25.90 and 28.72 MJ kg(-1) at 200 and 300 degrees C respectively, where the lower values were observed because of the lipid removal. The measured gas pressure developed, likely due to the production of CO2 and CH4 as major gases,(,) was 0.19 and 0.53 bars without LN2 treatment samples, while it was 0.13 and 0.58 bars with LN2. The torrefaction process (mild pyrolysis) energy analysis showed that the ER (energy ratio) without LN2 treatment sample with 0.485 at 200 degrees C was the highest and the lowest 0.407 energy ratio was found with LN2 treated sample at the higher treatment temperature (300 degrees C).
引用
收藏
页码:1642 / 1648
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [11] Importance of algae oil as a source of biodiesel
    Demirbas, Ayhan
    Demirbas, M. Fatih
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 52 (01) : 163 - 170
  • [12] Cascading microalgae biorefinery: Fast pyrolysis of Dunaliella tertiolecta lipid extracted-residue
    Francavilla, M.
    Kamaterou, P.
    Intini, S.
    Monteleone, M.
    Zabaniotou, A.
    [J]. ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2015, 11 : 184 - 193
  • [13] Microalgae biomass: a renewable source of energy
    Ghayal, M. S.
    Pandya, M. T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ENGINEERING AND APPLICATION (ICSEEA) 2012, 2013, 32 : 242 - 250
  • [14] Bioenergy co-products derived from microalgae biomass via thermochemical conversion - Life cycle energy balances and CO2 emissions
    Khoo, H. H.
    Koh, C. Y.
    Shaik, M. S.
    Sharratt, P. N.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 143 : 298 - 307
  • [15] A Review: Microalgae and Their Applications in CO2 Capture and Renewable Energy
    Klinthong, Worasaung
    Yang, Yi-Hung
    Huang, Chih-Hung
    Tan, Chung-Sung
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2015, 15 (02) : 712 - 742
  • [16] Kumar G, 2017, GREEN CHEM, V19, P44, DOI [10.1039/C6GC01937D, 10.1039/c6gc01937d]
  • [17] Evaluation and comparison of algal cell disruption methods: Microwave, waterbath, blender, ultrasonic and laser treatment
    McMillan, Jonathan R.
    Watson, Ian A.
    Ali, Mehmood
    Jaafar, Weaam
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 103 : 128 - 134
  • [18] Ultrasonic intensification as a tool for enhanced microbial biofuel yields
    Naveena, Balakrishnan
    Armshaw, Patricia
    Pembroke, J. Tony
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2015, 8
  • [19] Bioprocess modelling for the design and optimization of lignocellulosic biomass fermentation
    Unrean P.
    [J]. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 2016, 3 (01)
  • [20] More efficient biomass gasification via torrefaction
    Prins, Mark J.
    Ptasinski, Krzysztof J.
    Janssen, Frans J. J. G.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2006, 31 (15) : 3458 - 3470