Monitoring and evaluating eco-localisation: Lessons from UK low carbon community groups

被引:22
作者
Hobson, Kersty [1 ]
Mayne, Ruth [2 ]
Hamilton, Jo [2 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Glamorgan Bldg,King Edwards VII Ave, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford, England
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE | 2016年 / 48卷 / 07期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Localisation; knowledge exchange; monitoring and evaluation; community; RENEWABLE ENERGY; TRANSITION TOWNS; SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LOCALISM; POLITICS; IMPACT; RETHINKING; WORLD;
D O I
10.1177/0308518X16640531
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the UK low carbon' community groups and partnerships (LCCGPs) have flourished in recent years, with sectors such as community energy receiving increased national policy attention. Whilst such attention aligns LCCGPs with agendas such as New Localism' and climate change mitigation, other modes of local socio-environmental change are advocated and enacted under a broad rubric of eco-localisation'. Across the political and ideological spectrum however, there is growing interest in how LCCGPs understand and evaluate their impacts, with questions arising about what indicators, processes and tools are most pertinent and rigorous. In response, this paper draws on a knowledge exchange project that explored and trialled monitoring and evaluation (M&E) tools amongst a sample of UK LCCGPs in conjunction with groups and networks operating in an eco-localisation vein. Project findings highlight the positive effects that flexible and relevant M&E has on groups and networks. It also draws attention to the need for on-going support and facilitation for those undertaking M&E: vital if the burgeoning impact agenda' - whether emerging from central funders or eco-localist' networks themselves - does not over-burden or dishearten groups, thus causing the opposite effects of tools and processes meant to facilitate sustained and shared thinking, learning and action.
引用
收藏
页码:1393 / 1410
页数:18
相关论文
共 55 条
[11]   Performative Research for a Climate Politics of Hope: Rethinking Geographic Scale, "Impact" Scale, and Markets [J].
Cameron, Jenny ;
Hicks, Jarra .
ANTIPODE, 2014, 46 (01) :53-71
[12]   Big society, little justice? Community renewable energy and the politics of localism [J].
Catney, Philip ;
MacGregor, Sherilyn ;
Dobson, Andrew ;
Hall, Sarah Marie ;
Royston, Sarah ;
Robinson, Zoe ;
Ormerod, Mark ;
Ross, Simon .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 19 (07) :715-730
[13]   Geographies and politics of localism: The localism of the United Kingdom's coalition government [J].
Clarke, Nick ;
Cochrane, Allan .
POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 34 :10-23
[14]  
Coe J., 2008, IS YOUR CAMPAIGN MAK
[15]   Reviewing rescaling: Strengthening the case for environmental considerations [J].
Cohen, Alice ;
McCarthy, James .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 39 (01) :3-25
[16]   Constructing Legitimacy in the New Community Governance [J].
Connelly, Steve .
URBAN STUDIES, 2011, 48 (05) :929-946
[17]   Transitioning communities: community, participation and the Transition Town movement [J].
Connors, Phil ;
McDonald, Peter .
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 46 (04) :558-572
[18]  
DECC (UK Department of Energy and Climate Change), 2015, COMM EN STRAT UPD
[19]   Opening up the "local" to analysis: exploring the spatiality of UK urban decentralised energy initiatives [J].
Devine-Wright, Patrick ;
Wiersma, Bouke .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 18 (10) :1099-1116
[20]   Thinking about change for development practice: a case study from Oxfam GB [J].
Eyben, Rosalind ;
Kidder, Thalia ;
Rowlands, Jo ;
Bronstein, Audrey .
DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2008, 18 (02) :201-212