Scrubber: A potentially overestimated compliance method for the Emission Control Areas The importance of involving a ship's sailing pattern in the evaluation

被引:79
作者
Gu, Yewen [1 ]
Wallace, Stein W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Sch Econ, Dept Business & Management Sci, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Scrubber; Fuel-switching; Emission Control Areas; Sailing pattern; Port call density; Lifespan cost evaluation; SPEED OPTIMIZATION; REDUCTION; COSTS; TECHNOLOGIES; REGULATIONS; SELECTION; OPERATORS; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Different methods for sulphur emission reductions, available to satisfy the latest Emission Control Areas (ECA) regulations, may lead to different sailing patterns (route and speed choices of a vessel) and thus have significant impact on a shipping company's operating costs. However, the current literature does not include sailing pattern optimization caused by ECA, and its corresponding cost effects, in the evaluation and selection process for sulphur abatement technology. This leads to an inaccurate estimation of the value of certain technologies and hence an incorrect investment decision. In this paper, we integrate the optimization of a ship's sailing pattern into the lifespan cost assessment of the emission control technology, so that such expensive and irreversible decisions can be made more accurately. The results shows that a considerable overestimation of the value of scrubbers, and thus a substantial loss, can occur if the sailing pattern of a ship is not considered in the decision-making process. Furthermore, we also illustrate that it is more important to involve a ship's sailing pattern when the port call density inside ECA is low. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 66
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Alphaliner, 2016, ALPHALINER NEWSLETTE
[2]   Integrated maritime fleet deployment and speed optimization: Case study from RoRo shipping [J].
Andersson, Henrik ;
Fagerholt, Kjetil ;
Hobbesland, Kirsti .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 55 :233-240
[3]   Planning vessel air emission regulations compliance under uncertainty [J].
Balland, Oceane ;
Erikstad, Stein Ove ;
Fagerholt, Kjetil ;
Wallace, Stein W. .
JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 18 (03) :349-357
[4]   Green shipping: Marine engine pollution abatement using a combined catalyst/seawater scrubber system. 1. Effect of catalyst [J].
Boscarato, Ilan ;
Hickey, Neal ;
Kaspar, Jan ;
Prati, Maria Vittoria ;
Mariani, Antonio .
JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS, 2015, 328 :248-257
[5]   Compliance possibilities for the future ECA regulations through the use of abatement technologies or change of fuels [J].
Brynolf, S. ;
Magnusson, M. ;
Fridell, E. ;
Andersson, K. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 28 :6-18
[6]  
Clarkson Research, 2016, SHIPP INT NETW
[7]   Effect of a speed reduction of containerships in response to higher energy costs in Sulphur Emission Control Areas [J].
Doudnikoff, Marjorie ;
Lacoste, Romuald .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 28 :51-61
[8]  
ENTEC, 2005, SERV CONTR SHIP EM A
[9]   Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areas [J].
Fagerholt, Kjetil ;
Gausel, Nora T. ;
Rakke, Jorgen G. ;
Psaraftis, Harilaos N. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, 52 :57-73
[10]   Shipping sulphur regulation, freight transportation prices and diesel markets in the Baltic Sea region [J].
Hilmola, Olli-Pekka .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2015, 9 (01) :120-132